[Owasp-board] OWASP and Git repositories for projects
samantha.groves at owasp.org
Fri Jun 28 20:07:51 UTC 2013
I agree. I think we should have different options.
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Jim Manico <jim.manico at owasp.org> wrote:
> I think GitHub should be an *option*, not a forced requirement on
> projects. For many projects, SVN is still preferable.
> - Jim
> > Agreed. What are the limitations of using GitHub, Dennis?
> > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Matt Tesauro <matt.tesauro at owasp.org
> >> Note: started a new thread since the subject isn't Akamai
> >> [snip]
> >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >> From: Dennis Groves <dennis.groves at owasp.org>
> >> Date: Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:25 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [Owasp-board] Akamai EdgeControl Management Center Contact
> >> List
> >> To: Matt Tesauro <matt.tesauro at owasp.org>
> >> Cc: Tom Brennan <tomb at owasp.org>, OWASP Board List <
> >> owasp-board at lists.owasp.org>
> >> Not to make more work for Matt, and thank you Matt for all the amazing
> >> hard work.
> >> Should we not start hosting our *own* git repositories for the
> >> Or should I try and get github to give us more control over the current
> >> repositories? I don't know to what degree we want to have control over
> >> own property vs outsourced e.g. Salesforce and Rackspace?
> >> Cheers,
> >> Dennis
> >> [snip]
> >> If there are limitations or other issues with GitHub, I'd suggest we
> >> at Gitorious.
> >> They offer free hosting to opensource projects but also offer "branded"
> >> subdomains:
> >> http://www.gitorious.com/subdomain/
> >> The basic plan (which they host the repo + servers) is 99 EURO or ~
> >> $128.50/month and includes:
> >> * Subdomain - e.g. owasp.gitorious.org
> >> * Your logo
> >> * Page title
> >> * Listed on Gitorious's sponsor page
> >> Additionally, the Gitorious team can be hired to develop custom features
> >> or provide integrations to other systems (perhaps SalesForce?)
> >> http://www.gitorious.com/consulting/
> >> And if you are already under support, the custom development rate is
> >> reduced by 20 EURO (~$26)
> >> I also have a preference for OWASP to use open solutions where they are
> >> available and at par with proprietary options.
> >> To be honest, I'm very focused on completing the server updates &
> >> migrations so this would not make my queue for a while. However, if
> you or
> >> any other community member wants to look into this further, I'd welcome
> >> help.
> >> --
> >> -- Matt Tesauro
> >> OWASP WTE Project Lead
> >> http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Category:OWASP_Live_CD_Project
> >> http://AppSecLive.org - Community and Download site
> >> OWASP OpenStack Security Project Lead
> >> https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_OpenStack_Security_Project
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Owasp-board mailing list
> >> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
> >> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
> > _______________________________________________
> > Owasp-board mailing list
> > Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
> > https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
*Samantha Groves, MBA*****
*OWASP Projects Manager*
The OWASP Foundation
Email: samantha.groves at owasp.org
OWASP Global Projects<https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Category:OWASP_Project>
Book a Meeting with Me <http://goo.gl/mZXdZ>
OWASP Contact US Form <http://owasp4.owasp.org/contactus.html>
New Project Application
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Owasp-board