[Owasp-board] Vendor Neutrality
jim.manico at owasp.org
Thu Feb 14 00:03:03 UTC 2013
This looks like a chapter meeting to me.
This event was never listed as a regional event.... It's listed on the
chapter page... falls under chapter rules?
On Feb 13, 2013, at 3:56 PM, Dave Wichers <dave.wichers at owasp.org> wrote:
> This is not a chapter meeting. This is a chapter training event that they
> are charging a fee for, just like a chapter could hold a local conference
> and charge a fee for that too. And to be consistent with the OWASP
> Conferences, they are charging the same fee for these events as the OWASP
> Conferences do.
> I'm not sure I see the problem. Other than it could have been more clear
> that this was an OWASP Chapter sponsored training event, and not a Trustwave
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Manico [mailto:jim.manico at owasp.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 6:31 PM
> To: Dave Wichers
> Cc: 'OWASP Foundation Board List'
> Subject: Re: [Owasp-board] Vendor Neutrality
> See section 5.02 of the bylaws which state chapter meetings must follow the
> chapter handbook.
> Points to....
> Which state that all OWASP Chapter meetings need to be free per our bylaws.
> There is also this...
> Which states that vendors need to act independently at chapter meetings and
> chapter activites.
> In my opinion, this kind of activity completely blurs the lines between
> where OWASP ends and vendors start.
> I think we should do (a lot) better. Especially for an event driven by a
> board member!
> - Jim Manico
> (808) 652-3805
>> This is an OWASP Chapter Training event with a similar revenue split
>> as the OWASP Conferences.
>> While I think it could have been made more clear that this is an OWASP
>> Training event, and not just a Trustwave vendor training pitch in the
>> email, I wouldn't call this a major foul.
>> For example, it would have been better (in my opinion) if it said
>> "As a special introduction to the SpiderLabs instructor led course
>> being offered as part of the 1st ever OWASP NYC Chapter Training
>> Event, I would like to extend to you ..."
>> If this was just Trustwave trying to promote their own training event
>> that had nothing to do with OWASP, then yes, this would cross the line
>> in my opinion. (But its not).
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owasp-board-bounces at lists.owasp.org
>> [mailto:owasp-board-bounces at lists.owasp.org] On Behalf Of Jim Manico
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 5:48 PM
>> To: OWASP Foundation Board List
>> Subject: [Owasp-board] Vendor Neutrality
>> A few folks sent this text my way today. This went out to the NYC
>> chapter list yesterday. What do you think, Board, is this respecting
>> vendor neutrality?
>> From: Tom Brennan <tomb at owasp.org>
>> Date: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 6:56 PM
>> To: "OWASPNYCMETRO-announce at meetup.com"
>> <OWASPNYCMETRO-announce at meetup.com>
>> Subject: [OWASPNYCMETRO] NYC March 13th Training
>> Its coming....INSTRUCTOR LED TRAINING IN NYC
>> Details: https://www.owasp.org/index.php/NYC
>> As a special introduction to the SpiderLabs instructor led course I
>> would like to extend to you a $500 discount code "TRUSTWAVE_500OFF" to
>> be used during check-out.
>> Hack Your Own Code: Advanced Training for Developers (2 Day Training
>> Course) This class provides security developers an exciting chance to
>> hone their programming skills while also learning to exploit common
>> web vulnerabilities.
>> For more information on the (3) training classes available visit:
>> Have additional questions?
>> Call 973-202-0122 to discuss
>> Owasp-board mailing list
>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
More information about the Owasp-board