[Owasp-board] Whistleblower for 2014

Fabio Cerullo fcerullo at owasp.org
Thu Dec 19 08:22:15 UTC 2013


Martin +1.

Fabio


On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 6:25 AM, Seba <seba at owasp.org> wrote:

> Martin +1
> As ex-board member I would not be regarded as neutral
>
> Seba
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Jim Manico <jim.manico at owasp.org> wrote:
>
>> Agreed, Martin would do great here. +1
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jim Manico
>> @Manicode
>> (808) 652-3805
>>
>> On Dec 18, 2013, at 1:01 PM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
>>
>> I think Martin would be fantastic for this role.  +1
>>
>> ~josh
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Eoin Keary <eoin.keary at owasp.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I'd like Martin Knobloch to be considered.
>>>
>>>
>>> Eoin Keary
>>> Owasp Global Board
>>> +353 87 977 2988
>>>
>>>
>>> On 18 Dec 2013, at 21:56, Jim Manico <jim.manico at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> > I'd rather have a group do this. I'm happy to do the documentation and
>>> > grunt work, but I vote that Dennis, Josh and I all take on this role.
>>> > We can set up an email alias that all three of us can get a copy of,
>>> > or I can give out my number for those who want direct contact.
>>> >
>>> > These kinds of situations are tough! I'd like a few folks, and often
>>> > the entire board, to have visibility into these situations.
>>> >
>>> > Aloha,
>>> > --
>>> > Jim Manico
>>> > @Manicode
>>> > (808) 652-3805
>>> >
>>> >> On Dec 18, 2013, at 1:49 PM, Dennis Groves <dennis.groves at owasp.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> If your are serious, then  I am seriously flattered. However nobody
>>> >> could be more biased than the co-founder. I am a living breathing
>>> >> conflict of interest. :)
>>> >>
>>> >> In all seriousness Jim is a far better candidate than I, and an
>>> >> ombudsman is the right answer. Do we require an interim officer until
>>> >> such time as we can afford or require ombudsman services? Because that
>>> >> would be an entirely different matter...
>>> >>
>>> >> Cheers,
>>> >>
>>> >> Dennis
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 08:48:07 -0600 Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> I was unaware of this previous discussion.  Very well then.  I
>>> >>> withdraw my nomination of Jim to serve as Compliance Officer and
>>> >>> nominate Dennis Groves instead.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> ~josh
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> Owasp-board mailing list
>>> >> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>> >> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Owasp-board mailing list
>>> > Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>> > https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Owasp-board mailing list
>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Owasp-board mailing list
> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20131219/4230e76e/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Owasp-board mailing list