[Owasp-board] 2014 Board Meeting Dates

Michael Coates michael.coates at owasp.org
Tue Dec 17 18:22:44 UTC 2013


Board + Sarah,

To facilitate suggested times can you help me complete the following?

This page has everyone's primary timezone and which appsec events they're
attending.
https://docs.google.com/a/owasp.org/document/d/1zFDK7FYmk1ZSqjiJImxLrfX36xtaHXOsq67IwT2iq3w/edit






--
Michael Coates
Chair, Global Board
OWASP
@_mwc



On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Michael Coates
<michael.coates at owasp.org>wrote:

> Unless we have a large group that wants to dramatically change our
> approach I recommend we stay with our unanimous vote from the board
> meeting. I recognize that people have other things going on in life, we all
> do, and the decision to volunteer time towards an OWASP board role is no
> small commitment. The goal of scheduling the meetings for all of 2014 is so
> we can plan and accommodate these important meetings.
>
> I'll start a doodle with several options for us to evaluate. We'll need to
> agree on dates that can accommodate everyone with the understanding that
> attendance (in person or virtual) is required at 3 of 4 meetings.
>
> -Michael
>
>
> --
> Michael Coates
> Chair, Global Board
> OWASP
> @_mwc
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:24 AM, Eoin <eoinkeary at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Could we do two 3h meetings a quarter?
>> 1 on weekends and 1 during the working week....
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 17 December 2013 12:55, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Sure.  If you were always 100% booked it could.  Likewise, it will
>>> always take that time away from my family and force me to cancel recurring
>>> lessons for my kids that I've already got planned.  I've got two days a
>>> week to spend with my family.  You've got 5 days to work.  Regardless, I'm
>>> willing to compromise, but will not do two 6hr Sat meetings.  One would be
>>> hard enough to explain.
>>>
>>> ~josh
>>> On Dec 17, 2013 2:18 AM, "Eoin Keary" <eoinkeary at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I can't do 6hr meets during working week.
>>>> I have bills to pay. That could cost me circa $1200 to do the meeting.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Eoin Keary
>>>> Owasp Global Board
>>>> +353 87 977 2988
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 17 Dec 2013, at 02:12, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Seems kinda crappy that the old board decides the duration and days
>>>> that the new board will meet.  I'd like to propose a new vote amongst the
>>>> new board in order to determine whether this is still the most convenient
>>>> for everyone.
>>>>
>>>> Personally, I have no issue with 6 hr meetings if its during the work
>>>> week.  I also have no issue with shorter meetings if they are on the
>>>> weekend.  I take issue with the combination as it takes significant time
>>>> away from my family and I already have things scheduled for my children on
>>>> Saturdays.
>>>> On Dec 16, 2013 6:28 PM, "Michael Coates" <michael.coates at owasp.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It's not just me. This was voted on during the board meeting at
>>>>> Europe. 6 hr meetings provide time to get stuff done. The consensus was
>>>>> that each year the board would plan the events for the following year. They
>>>>> would be on Saturdays or in some cases week days to align with AppSec
>>>>> events.
>>>>>
>>>>> Vote was aug 19 - https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Board_Votes
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regarding the selected dates, 3 out of 4 are good, but I can't do the
>>>>> June 27 date.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -Michael
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Michael Coates
>>>>> Chair, Global Board
>>>>> OWASP
>>>>> @_mwc
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> If we were only doing 1-2 hours once a month, then Saturday would
>>>>>> probably be fine, but since it seemed that Michael really wanted to go for
>>>>>> longer meetings once a quarter, I would much prefer to do these during the
>>>>>> week where it does not impact the limited amount of time I have with my
>>>>>> family.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ~josh
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Sarah Baso <sarah.baso at owasp.org>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Board member -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *No meeting next monday (23rd), I will update the meeting invite. *
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We do need to finalize the meeting dates for next year to get them
>>>>>>> on the calendar so everyone can plan accordingly:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here were my suggestions to get the ball rolling:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    Saturday April 12 or 19 (after end of Q1 with sufficient time
>>>>>>>    for Alison to reconcile reports) We also should have a wrap up of 2013
>>>>>>>    finances by then for review
>>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    Friday June 27 in person in Cambridge (conference is Monday -
>>>>>>>    Thursday June 23-26th)
>>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    Monday September 15th in person in Denver (conference is Tuesday
>>>>>>>    - Friday Sept 16-19th)
>>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    Saturday Nov 8 or 15 - new board members are elected and
>>>>>>>    planning for 2015.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>>> Sarah
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Executive Director
>>>>>>> OWASP Foundation
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> sarah.baso at owasp.org
>>>>>>> +1.312.869.2779
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>>>>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>>>>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>>>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>>>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Eoin Keary
>> OWASP Global Board Member
>> OWASP Code Review Guide Lead Author
>>
>> https://twitter.com/EoinKeary
>>
>> http://twitter.com/BCCRiskAdvisory
>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20131217/0b434b6e/attachment.html>


More information about the Owasp-board mailing list