[Owasp-board] Tweets about ED position
tomb at owasp.org
Sat Apr 13 23:37:04 UTC 2013
Drive the next public board meeting for community discussion - 2cents
It's about what is good for OWASP that is why we were elected by membership.
On Apr 13, 2013, at 11:14 PM, Eoin <eoin.keary at owasp.org> wrote:
> Eoin Keary
> Owasp Global Board
> +353 87 977 2988
> On 13 Apr 2013, at 20:55, Michael Coates <michael.coates at owasp.org> wrote:
>> Jim and board,
>> I took a look at the tweets. You captured things well there. Thanks!
>> We have thousands of involved individuals with OWASP. People have a variety of opinions on what OWASP should be and how it should operate. It's only natural for there to be differing opinions on critical decisions. This of course is where an elected board comes into play with the responsibility of seeing the whole picture and making tough decisions on what's best for OWASP.
>> I'll jump onto the thread and clarify the facts so people are speaking with the right info. As always, everything we have is public and the board call is a great place for people to jump in if they want to discuss in real time.
>> Michael Coates | OWASP | @_mwc
>> On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Jim Manico <jim.manico at owasp.org> wrote:
>>> I'm with you Eoin. I think the board did good here. The 2-step
>>> messaging was probably not necessary, announcement #1 could have been
>>> "we promoted Sarah".
>>> Jim Manico
>>> (808) 652-3805
>>> On Apr 13, 2013, at 3:07 PM, Eoin <eoin.keary at owasp.org> wrote:
>>> > If an org hires a director we look for the most qualified person. Eg. Sarah.
>>> > She knows the org, works rate is high, legal expert etc.
>>> > Do we actually think we should vote for an exec director or ask the world if anyone would like the job given we looked internally and found a suitable person?
>>> > What we did was best for the organisation. We can stand by the decision. Michael can you address the community such that this issue does not fester and we can explain our MO and approach used.
>>> > Eoin Keary
>>> > Owasp Global Board
>>> > +353 87 977 2988
>>> > On 13 Apr 2013, at 19:50, Jim Manico <jim.manico at owasp.org> wrote:
>>> >> Sent this out today after a few folks complained about how we hired
>>> >> Sarah.... Best read from bottom up.
>>> >> <photo.PNG>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> Owasp-board mailing list
>>> >> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>> >> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
> Owasp-board mailing list
> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Owasp-board