[Owasp-board] OWASP on Linkedin - Subgroup "Official OWASP Member"

Kelly Santalucia kelly.santalucia at owasp.org
Thu Mar 8 19:03:42 UTC 2012


The idea is good and the work should not be unmanageable.
Thanks,

On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Michael Coates <michael.coates at owasp.org>wrote:

> This group won't have a discussion forum or limit access to any data. It's
> the same ideas as a membership card (which is members only). This is just
> the digital equivalent.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Michael Coates | OWASP
> michael.coates at owasp.org | @_mwc
>
>
>
> On Mar 8, 2012, at 10:48 AM, Kate Hartmann wrote:
>
> > The maintenance would be manageable.  As long as no one sees any conflict
> > with the Openness of OWASP in having a "members only" partition.  The
> idea
> > of having a "members only" partition to the wiki was voted down as being
> too
> > exclusionary.
> >
> > Kate Hartmann
> > Operations Director
> > 301-275-9403
> > www.owasp.org
> > Skype:  Kate.hartmann1
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Michael Coates [mailto:michael.coates at owasp.org]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 1:42 PM
> > To: global_membership_committee at lists.owasp.org
> > Cc: OWASP Foundation Board List; Kate Hartmann; Kelly Santalucia; Sarah
> Baso
> > Subject: OWASP on Linkedin - Subgroup "Official OWASP Member"
> >
> > Well,
> > It's only been a few hours and I've already received a request to join
> the
> > "OWASP Official Member" subgroup.
> >
> > The request included the member's name and membership number.
> >
> > Seems like there is some interest here. Before I accept it (and commit to
> > this idea), what are people's thoughts?
> >
> > Membership committee - Do you like this idea?
> > Board - Just a heads up
> > Kate & Kelly - This would require someone to manage the inbound requests
> to
> > verify membership and also a monthly purge of expired members.  I'm
> guessing
> > not too much work and potentially a good perk for membership. Thoughts?
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > Michael Coates | OWASP
> > michael.coates at owasp.org | @_mwc
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mar 7, 2012, at 5:54 PM, Michael Coates wrote:
> >
> >> Here's another idea, we can do a subgroup that is for official members.
> >>
> >> I've created the subgroup and we can explore / discuss if this is the
> > right approach.
> >>
> >> http://www.linkedin.com/groups?home=&gid=4342746&trk=anet_ug_hm
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------
> >> Michael Coates | OWASP
> >> michael.coates at owasp.org | @_mwc
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mar 7, 2012, at 5:48 PM, Michael Coates wrote:
> >>
> >>> Membership Committee,
> >>>
> >>> I'd be very interested to hear your recommendations on how we should
> > handle the OWASP linked in group
> >>> http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Global-OWASP-Foundation-36874
> >>>
> >>> Is this a good way to reach out to new people?
> >>> How do we handle the stream of discussions there?
> >>> Should the ability to become a "member" of the OWASP linked in group
> be a
> > benefit of OWASP membership?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------
> >>> Michael Coates | OWASP
> >>> michael.coates at owasp.org | @_mwc
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>


-- 
Kelly Santalucia

Operational Support:****

Membership and Business Liaison
Direct: 973-670-5784
Url: http://www.owasp.org/index.php/NYNJMetro
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20120308/917c1ec0/attachment.html>


More information about the Owasp-board mailing list