[Owasp-board] OWASP on Linkedin - Subgroup "Official OWASP Member"

Kate Hartmann kate.hartmann at owasp.org
Thu Mar 8 18:48:58 UTC 2012


The maintenance would be manageable.  As long as no one sees any conflict
with the Openness of OWASP in having a "members only" partition.  The idea
of having a "members only" partition to the wiki was voted down as being too
exclusionary.  

Kate Hartmann
Operations Director
301-275-9403
www.owasp.org 
Skype:  Kate.hartmann1

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Coates [mailto:michael.coates at owasp.org] 
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 1:42 PM
To: global_membership_committee at lists.owasp.org
Cc: OWASP Foundation Board List; Kate Hartmann; Kelly Santalucia; Sarah Baso
Subject: OWASP on Linkedin - Subgroup "Official OWASP Member"

Well,
It's only been a few hours and I've already received a request to join the
"OWASP Official Member" subgroup.

The request included the member's name and membership number.

Seems like there is some interest here. Before I accept it (and commit to
this idea), what are people's thoughts?

Membership committee - Do you like this idea?
Board - Just a heads up
Kate & Kelly - This would require someone to manage the inbound requests to
verify membership and also a monthly purge of expired members.  I'm guessing
not too much work and potentially a good perk for membership. Thoughts?


---------------------------------------------------
Michael Coates | OWASP
michael.coates at owasp.org | @_mwc



On Mar 7, 2012, at 5:54 PM, Michael Coates wrote:

> Here's another idea, we can do a subgroup that is for official members.
> 
> I've created the subgroup and we can explore / discuss if this is the
right approach.
> 
> http://www.linkedin.com/groups?home=&gid=4342746&trk=anet_ug_hm
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Michael Coates | OWASP
> michael.coates at owasp.org | @_mwc
> 
> 
> 
> On Mar 7, 2012, at 5:48 PM, Michael Coates wrote:
> 
>> Membership Committee,
>> 
>> I'd be very interested to hear your recommendations on how we should
handle the OWASP linked in group
>> http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Global-OWASP-Foundation-36874
>> 
>> Is this a good way to reach out to new people?
>> How do we handle the stream of discussions there?
>> Should the ability to become a "member" of the OWASP linked in group be a
benefit of OWASP membership?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------
>> Michael Coates | OWASP
>> michael.coates at owasp.org | @_mwc
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 




More information about the Owasp-board mailing list