[Owasp-board] Reboot Project

Eoin eoin.keary at owasp.org
Fri Apr 13 11:36:58 UTC 2012


Dave, Tom

What is your vote?

1:

https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Projects_Reboot_2012

Yes / No
2:
Payment of leaders
Yes/No


On 12 April 2012 22:02, Matt Tesauro <matt.tesauro at owasp.org> wrote:

> I support the reboot.
>
> I do not support the idea of preventing leaders from being paid.
>
> I second the points raised by Michael below.  He beat me in expressing
> them on this list.
>
> -- Matt's phone
>  On Apr 12, 2012 3:02 PM, "Michael Coates" <michael.coates at owasp.org>
> wrote:
>
>> I support the reboot.  I believe we should determine the needs of the
>> projects that are being rebooted and responsibly fund those needs.  This
>> requires an objective and transparent process along with established
>> deliverables.
>>
>>     Can we also step up and agree or disagree regarding the payment of
>>> leaders?
>>>
>>
>> Each project has a variety of needs - marketing, QA, tech writers, dev,
>> etc.  I support the responsible use of funds to be applied in the best way
>> to make the project successful.  The goal is a useful, powerful project
>> that is open source and helps advance our mission.  I do not believe we
>> should specifically limit who can receive these funds as long as we have a
>> good, open process. So I do not support the idea of preventing leaders from
>> being paid.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -------
>>  Michael Coates | OWASP
>> michael.coates at owasp.org | @_mwc
>>
>>
>>
>>  On Apr 12, 2012, at 12:11 PM, Eoin wrote:
>>
>>  Thanks seba,
>> Dave, Tom, Matt, Mike??
>>
>>
>> Eoin Keary
>> BCC Risk Advisory
>> Owasp Global Board
>> +353 87 977 2988
>>
>>
>> On 12 Apr 2012, at 20:02, Seba <seba at owasp.org> wrote:
>>
>>  I agree!
>> --seba
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 1:14 PM, eoin keary <eoin.keary at owasp.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I have layed out the reboot project plan and ethos on the wiki.
>>>
>>> https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Projects_Reboot_2012
>>>
>>> Seba's suggestions echo what is on the ppt I sent to you all and there
>>> is a link to it on the wiki.
>>> Can we agree to this approach?
>>>
>>> Can we also step up and agree or disagree regarding the payment of
>>> leaders?
>>>
>>> My view is we need to refresh projects. I have no issue with paying
>>> people to do this.
>>> It is a good spend of our funds if we can deliver world class solutions.
>>> this can only help OWASP.
>>>
>>> *We can be open source zealots but nothing will change if we don't
>>> change our approach. *
>>> *The world does not care if we pay or don't pay individuals. The world
>>> would like to have some guidance on application security.*
>>>
>>> Once we have agreement, I shall ask Kate to get a project submission
>>> form developed for individuals who want to reboot.
>>> I shall also approach all stagnant project leaders to ask for commitment
>>> or transition of leadership....
>>>
>>> Eoin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Global Board Member (Vice Chair)
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Owasp-board mailing list
>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Owasp-board mailing list
>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>
>>


-- 
Eoin Keary
OWASP Global Board Member (Vice Chair)

https://twitter.com/EoinKeary
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20120413/72eb6335/attachment.html>


More information about the Owasp-board mailing list