[Owasp-board] In case you missed it...

Eoin eoin.keary at owasp.org
Wed Apr 11 21:29:21 UTC 2012


Thanks jim.
Board what are your thoughts on this.
I'd like to put this to bed soon and start planning.


Eoin Keary
BCC Risk Advisory
Owasp Global Board
+353 87 977 2988


On 11 Apr 2012, at 20:06, Jim Manico <jim.manico at owasp.org> wrote:

> Eoin, I'm also 100% in support of this plan.
> 
> I also would rather see a vote on your plan, instead of a vote that sets
> up a firewall rule to disallow paying certain people.
> 
> I feel that your plan supports the OWASP mission! It also has a huge
> potential to revitalize the organization.
> 
> I feel that negative financing rule inhibits our mission.
> 
> - Jim
>> Not trying to complicate, I just want to understand everything. Plus these will be the same questions others will ask, so it's good for us to have it flushed out.
>> 
>> I'm supportive of the overall plan.
>> 
>> 
>> -------
>> Michael Coates | OWASP
>> michael.coates at owasp.org | @_mwc
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Apr 11, 2012, at 10:54 AM, Eoin wrote:
>> 
>>> Plan is on the wiki and in the document I shared with you last week.
>>> Outstanding issue is do project leads get paid. 90% of projects have only 1 main leader.
>>> Why are we over complicating things?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Eoin Keary
>>> BCC Risk Advisory
>>> Owasp Global Board
>>> +353 87 977 2988
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 11 Apr 2012, at 18:47, Jim Manico <jim.manico at owasp.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>> I'd rather vote on a plan rather than a single statement
>>>> Amen! Whitelisting a good plan, FTW!
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Jim Manico
>>>> VP, Security Architecture
>>>> WhiteHat Security
>>>> (808) 652-3805
>>>> 
>>>> On Apr 11, 2012, at 11:41 AM, Michael Coates <michael.coates at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> I'd rather vote on a plan rather than a single statement
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jim Manico
> 
> Connections Committee Chair
> Cheatsheet Series Product Manager
> OWASP Podcast Producer/Host
> 
> jim at owasp.org
> www.owasp.org


More information about the Owasp-board mailing list