[Owasp-board] A draft proposal document for Project Re-boot
eoin.keary at owasp.org
Tue Apr 3 15:18:28 UTC 2012
There have been 75 emails since last week on the issue.
They had their chance.
You should really look at what is proposed rather than the fuckology around
Majority of people support this from Dinis to Dennis G to Jim M, to Michael
The reason OWASP is in such Shite is because we are way to tied up in
"process" and we are getting nothing done.
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Thomas Brennan <tomb at owasp.org> wrote:
> Has the GPC and it's members looked at this yet and we have support?
> (hence purpose of committees)
> In dc very important indeed
> On Apr 3, 2012, at 11:11 AM, Eoin <eoin.keary at owasp.org> wrote:
> Great question......Tom
> This has little to do with GPC initially.
> They shall be involved in terms of quality and assisting with logistics.
> I don't want to get tied up in politics or turf wars.
> I want to get some stuff done.
> If GPC spend their funding on worthwhile activities, hey that's great it
> can only add to the foundation. I doubt we shall allocate funding on the
> same activities twice :)
> This is a stand alone initiative, an attempt to make OWASP better.
> make sense...
> On 3 April 2012 16:06, Thomas Brennan <tomb at owasp.org> wrote:
>> Would this be in addition to the GPC approved budget?
>> Sent from a mobile device; If you have any questions on this email let's
>> discuss the old fashion way @ 973-202-0122
>> On Apr 3, 2012, at 10:34 AM, eoin keary <eoin.keary at owasp.org> wrote:
>> Lets talk on Thursday.
>> Please give it a quick read before then.
>> Global Board Member (Vice Chair)
>> <OWASP Project Reboot - Proposal.pdf>
>> Owasp-board mailing list
>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
> Eoin Keary
> OWASP Global Board Member (Vice Chair)
Global Board Member (Vice Chair)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Owasp-board