[Owasp-board] Paulo's contract

Eoin eoin.keary at owasp.org
Thu May 26 13:35:22 UTC 2011


Yes from me.
but he may not get the same next year.

On 24 May 2011 01:51, Dave Wichers <dave.wichers at owasp.org> wrote:

> Nothing has been communicated to him. I proposed a raise, Seba countered
> with a lower amount, which I'm OK with.
>
> So that is two yes votes for 9.2%.
>
> What do Matt/Eoin/Jeff think?
>
> Thanks, Dave
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Brennan [mailto:tomb at owasp.org]
>  Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 12:35 PM
> To: Seba; Eoin; Dave Wichers; Matt Tesauro; Jeff Williams
> Subject: Re: RE: [Owasp-board] Paulo's contract
>
> So this was the last email on the thread... what has, who has communicated
> it to Paulo?
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Seba <seba at owasp.org> wrote:
> > All,
> > on reporting: proper governance indicates all payed people should
> > report to the operational manager, who in turn reports to the board.
> > on the salary, I also think 15% is stretching it.
> > Paulo now earns about EUR 2270 per month.
> > I suggest a maximum increase to EUR 2500 per month on contractor basis.
> > This is a 9,2% increase.
> >
> > --Seba
> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Eoin <eoin.keary at owasp.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> 15% is significant. Unheard of in current climate.
> >>
> >> Sent from my HTC hero.
> >>
> >> owasp board member
> >>
> >> On 21 Apr 2011 18:23, "Dave Wichers" <dave.wichers at owasp.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Paulo is actually asking for A LOT more, like 30%+. I’m proposing
> >> 15%. I think in London, even though it was more expensive, I suspect
> >> he wasn’t paying any taxes, but don’t know that for sure. But he is
> >> now, and that’s why he is asking for such a significant increase. He
> >> wants to make the same amount of $ that he used to make in Portugal.
> >> That’s his target anyway. He’s not trying to make the same amount he
> made
> in London.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> So, I’m proposing we compromise at 15%, because I would hate to lose
> >> him, but if you feel strongly it should be less, then I’m OK with that.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> With regard to reporting we have:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Jeff/Dave/Eoin: He report to Board per his request.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Matt: He is OK either way. (And I agree with you that it should
> >> normally be to Kate)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Seba, Tom (I think that’s Tom’s position): report to Kate
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Anyway, since 4 of us support him reporting to the Board, I think we
> >> should go with that (for historical reasons).
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Now we just need to agree on the pay raise.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> And I think we all agree he should be a contractor and stay that way.
> >> He already is.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -Dave
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> From: mtesauro at gmail.com [mailto:mtesauro at gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> >> Matt Tesauro
> >> Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 12:04 PM
> >> To: Dave Wichers
> >> Cc: Tom Brennan; Jeff Williams; seba at owasp.org; Eoin
> >>
> >> Subject: Re: [Owasp-board] Paulo's contract
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I believe I had expressed my opinion on a previous call or email,
> >> however, my position is:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ...
> >
>
>


-- 
Eoin Keary
OWASP Global Board Member
OWASP Code Review Guide Lead Author

Sent from my i-Transmogrifier
http://asg.ie/
https://twitter.com/EoinKeary
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20110526/144247f2/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Owasp-board mailing list