[Owasp-board] Electronic Vote

Matt Tesauro matt.tesauro at owasp.org
Sat Apr 16 16:33:52 UTC 2011

Eoin:  I agree with staggering but technically speaking, that's not what
we're voting on.  We should communicate this to the committee chairs first.
 I sat in on the committee chair call earlier in the week and warned those
on that call that OWASP is not flush with cash and we may need to scale back
the committee budgets in the near term.  However, we need to make sure
committees understand this is not us hindering their work but the current
fiscal realities.

My votes:

No on remaining budgets.
    More time is needed to understand fully the impact of the summit's
expense on this years budget.
No on the ByLaws.
    I'd like to have some time to review what Seba sent.

I propose we re-vote these issues next Friday (April 22) to give us the time
to look into them - especially the budget issue.

I also have a proposal I'll be crafting on how to allocate OWASP funds going
forward with respect to the global committees and overarching expenses
(those that touch multiple committees).  However, I need some more time with
the numbers I got from Alison before I can make a specific proposal.

-- Matt Tesauro
OWASP Board Member
OWASP WTE Project Lead
http://AppSecLive.org - Community and Download site

On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 4:46 AM, Eoin <eoin.keary at owasp.org> wrote:

> Yes, bit let's stagger committee funding or provide when required.
> Sent from my HTC hero.
> owasp board member
> On 15 Apr 2011 13:48, "seba seba" <seba at owasp.org> wrote:
> All,
> 1. Yes, but under the condition that these are part of an overall 2011
> budget?
> 2. No - I have some questions & remarks on the Bylaws attached. There are
> references that are not clear, roles that are not defined and committee's of
> which no governance is defined. Furthermore I'd like to add a paragraph that
> clarifies the International role which provides a legal umbrella for legal
> entities in other countries or regions that fall under it.
> --Seba
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Kate Hartmann <kate.hartmann at owasp.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > As per the board...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20110416/89efd76b/attachment-0002.html>

More information about the Owasp-board mailing list