[Owasp-board] REQUEST FOR COMMENTS/IMPORTANT/ RE: [Owasp-google-hacking] [GPC] bing Port
paulo.coimbra at owasp.org
Sun Sep 5 18:47:02 UTC 2010
Brad (and GPC & Board),
I am writing you to ask you whether or not you are open to reconsider your
decision regarding the permission you have given to Christian for him to
create a new project.
Without forgetting that everyone is innocent until the contrary is proven,
in my view, until the Google Hacking Project's inquiry is finished, we
shouldn't allow Christian to increase his OWASP responsibilities and/or
For one thing, the permission for him to create a new project, in my view,
is not coherent with our former decision to not consider his application to
lead the ASVS until the GHP's inquiry is closed.
For another, I might be wrong but honestly believe that Christian's
behaviour is censurable and I am not sure if he currently has the conditions
to lead any OWASP activities.
In a nutshell, in my perspective, when dealing with the inquiry findings, we
should address the following situations:
- Christian's serious and false accusations that we were
intentionally delaying the inquiry to ensure maximum damage to his
reputation. In his own words: "(...) I have no doubt that the inquiry has
been delayed so it will be twisted to ensure maximum damage to my reputation
while OWASP attempts to distance itself from its lack of action during the
entire lifetime of this project such as the continued removal from the OWASP
Leaders List and recently marking my project inactive (not in September 2009
when requested) (...)",
- Christian's lack of respect showed towards Sebastien which has
motivated from him the following comment: 'After proposing to rename the
Melbourne chapter mailing list from "Australia" to Melbourne and having an
overall Australia Melbourne list, Christian reacted with insults and
- Christian's refusal to act in conformity when was told by Dinis
the following: "(...) Finally, Christian, since we have marked the OWASP
Google Hacking project as discontinued (see
think it time that you dropped the tag "OWASP "Google Hacking" Project Lead
- http://sn.im/owasp_google_hacking" from your email signature (...)",
- Christian's long and repeated insistence (to me, also
inexplicable and unbearable) on calling "trolls" to people who protested
saying the project code was not available.
Please let me know your thoughts.
<https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Main_Page> OWASP Project Manager
From: owasp-google-hacking-bounces at lists.owasp.org
[mailto:owasp-google-hacking-bounces at lists.owasp.org] On Behalf Of Brad
Sent: domingo, 5 de Setembro de 2010 04:34
To: Christian Heinrich; Global Projects Committee;
owasp-google-hacking at lists.owasp.org
Subject: Re: [Owasp-google-hacking] [GPC] bing Port
Please create a new project. Thanks!
On 9/3/10, Christian Heinrich <christian.heinrich at owasp.org> wrote:
> I have started porting
> to bing
> Subsequently, I have created a new repository for this port at
> http://dic.codeplex.com/ for the Proof of Concept which I intend to
> have an Alpha release available towards the end of this year (i.e.
> Can you please advise me if it is preferred to collapse existing
> "Google Hacking" Project Name or to propose this a new project?
> I would prefer not to collapse the "Google Hacking" namespace as the
> intent of this project is to advance the state of the art from
> http://www.hackersforcharity.org/ghdb/ - rather I would prefer to
> propose a new project.
> Please let me know your thoughts or if you have any alternatives to
> Christian Heinrich - http://www.owasp.org/index.php/user:cmlh
> OWASP "Google Hacking" Project Lead -
> Global-projects-committee mailing list
> Global-projects-committee at lists.owasp.org
Sent from my mobile device
CISSP, MCSE, C|EH, CIFI, CGSP
"Si vis pacem, para bellum"
Owasp-google-hacking mailing list
Owasp-google-hacking at lists.owasp.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Owasp-board