[Owasp-board] (just board) Fwd: [Owasp-leaders] AppSec DC

dinis cruz dinis.cruz at owasp.org
Fri Oct 22 09:56:03 UTC 2010


Yes I had a couple complains, and this is one of the cases where 'silence'
speaks volumes

Dinis Cruz


On 22 October 2010 10:25, Eoin <eoin.keary at owasp.org> wrote:

> Dinis,
>
> Has anyone complained?
> Otherwise I would not go too hard on him and alienate him.
>
> Eoin
>
>
>
>
> On 21 October 2010 23:37, dinis cruz <dinis.cruz at owasp.org> wrote:
>
>> Board, I find Rex's comment below completely out of line and offensive to
>> our leaders.
>>
>> What is the best way to turn this around? Are you guys close to Rex (i.e.
>> know him personally/can talk to him)?
>>
>> This whole situation (Jim posting the info on the blog and being 'asked'
>> to remove the 'free attendance by leaders' part) is a good example of how
>> NOT to treat our leaders (and how to send a message of how much we 'care'
>> and 'respect' them).
>>
>> I'm happy to follow-up Rex's email, but I'm not sure how to do it
>> without hitting hard on Rex (which is probably not fair on him).
>>
>> Does one of you guys want to have a go?
>>
>> Dinis Cruz
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Rex Booth <rex.booth at owasp.org>
>> Date: 19 October 2010 16:41
>> Subject: Re: [Owasp-leaders] AppSec DC
>> To: "owasp-leaders at lists.owasp.org" <owasp-leaders at lists.owasp.org>
>> Cc: "owasp-leaders at lists.owasp.org" <owasp-leaders at lists.owasp.org>
>>
>>
>>  Those who become leaders for free conference admission are leaders in
>> name only.  We're not interested in rewarding people who aren't actual
>> contributors.
>>
>> Rex
>>
>>
>> On Oct 19, 2010, at 11:32 AM, Neil Matatall <neil at owasp.org> wrote:
>>
>>    Just curious, why is this such a bad thing?  If leaders get in for
>> free, wouldn't that motivate more to become leaders?
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 2:58 AM, Jim Manico < <jim.manico at owasp.org>
>> jim.manico at owasp.org> wrote:
>>
>>>  Per the request of the OWASP AppSec conference leads, I deleted the
>>> fact that OWASP Leaders get in for free from the blog post here:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> <http://owasp.blogspot.com/2010/10/appsec-dc-is-back.html>
>>> http://owasp.blogspot.com/2010/10/appsec-dc-is-back.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Man, you DC cats all freak me out. You need to visit us in Hawaii more
>>> often. J
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers guys. And sincerely, I hope you have a fantastic conference! I’ll
>>> be more careful about posting info about DC events in the future.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> - Jim
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OWASP-Leaders mailing list
>>> <OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org>OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org
>>>  <https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-leaders>
>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-leaders
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> --
>>
>> Neil
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>> OWASP-Leaders mailing list
>> OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org
>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-leaders
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OWASP-Leaders mailing list
>> OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org
>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-leaders
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Owasp-board mailing list
>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Eoin Keary
> OWASP Global Board Member
> OWASP Code Review Guide Lead Author
>
> Sent from my i-Transmogrifier
> http://asg.ie/
> https://twitter.com/EoinKeary
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20101022/ff588571/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Owasp-board mailing list