[Owasp-board] AppSec Brasil 2010 contract draft

Eoin eoin.keary at owasp.org
Mon Apr 26 21:42:27 UTC 2010


Hey,
have you received any other feedback on this document?
regards,
Eoin

On 26 April 2010 22:29, Lucas Ferreira <listas at sapao.net> wrote:

> Hello All,
>
> here is a second version of the agreement. It incorporates all the
> changes and comments I received from the first version.
>
> Please review it so we can have it signed ASAP. We already have
> sponsors that want to pay and expenses we need to make.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Lucas
>
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 22:13, Lucas Ferreira <listas at sapao.net> wrote:
> > As I promised, here are the the fees and taxes we will need to pay to
> > the Instituto Turing regarding AppSec Brasil 2010:
> >
> > On all income: 8.25% as federal taxes.
> >
> > Fixed: BRL 7400.00 as administrative expenses (accountant, bank fees,
> etc)
> >
> > On all profits sent to the OWASP Foundation: 25% (federal taxes) plus
> > banking fees.
> >
> > We won't have to pay the Instituto Turing as they prefer being an
> > event sponsor instead of changing us.
> >
> > I'll ask them to list all these fees on the contract.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Lucas
> >
> > PS: please forward this to the board list. My emails to this list are
> > bouncing back.
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 14:34, Lucas Ferreira <listas at sapao.net> wrote:
> >> Hello Eoin,
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 13:26, Eoin <eoin.keary at owasp.org> wrote:
> >>> Hey,
> >>>
> >>> Had a few seconds re this contract;
> >>>
> >>> Fund management is being done by the organiser, is this the usual for
> >>> Brazil? Is there are % the event organiser is entitled to?
> >>
> >> In accordance to Brazilian laws, we need a legally registered entity
> >> to make the conference happen (more clearly: we cannot receive any
> >> money if we do not exist to the government). So we decided to seek the
> >> help of an existing entity instead of registering a new one, due to
> >> time and bureacratic constraints.
> >>
> >> We haven't finished the negotiation on the percentages. I'll send more
> >> info on that ASAP.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Liability:
> >>> We are liable for injury etc if the Organiser gets hurt, is this
> standard
> >>> procedure?
> >>
> >> I'm not sure. I'll verify that.
> >>
> >>> We are liable for expenses also, is this all expenses?
> >>
> >> All approved expenses. Since they cannot make expenses without
> >> approval, we are not liable for non-approved expenses. We could make
> >> thsi clearer in the contract also.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> General question:
> >>> Is the committee a legal entity? How does this work. Do individuals
> need to
> >>> be identified?
> >>
> >> No, we'll have to nominate each committee member.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Lucas
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Eoin
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 22 April 2010 16:45, dinis cruz <dinis.cruz at owasp.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hey Lucas
> >>>> Jeff has a Laywer's background and Dave usually looks at OWASP related
> >>>> contracts, so I'm CCing them (& the rest of the Board) to see if they
> have
> >>>> time to comment on this.
> >>>> Sorry if you already replied to this, but can you provide more details
> on
> >>>> the current brazilian Non-Profit you have created (called "Instituto
> >>>> Turing") , its structure, and what are your expectations for the OWASP
> US
> >>>> entitity?
> >>>> Btw, great job on the organization of the next Brazilian conference :)
> >>>>
> >>>> Dinis Cruz
> >>>>
> >>>> On 22 April 2010 12:55, Lucas Ferreira <listas at sapao.net> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hello Dinis and Matt,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> we are drafting a contract to be signed by the Foundation and the
> >>>>> Brazilian Company that will handle AppSec Brasil 2010's financials.
> We
> >>>>> need this company to have a local presence in order to be able to
> >>>>> issue invoices and collect the right taxes and to handle other
> >>>>> requirements. These tasks can only be performed by an entity legally
> >>>>> registered with the Brazilian Government.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We have a draft of the contract to be signed attached. Could you
> >>>>> please see if it is adequate?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Lucas
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >>>>> From: Lucas Ferreira <listas at sapao.net>
> >>>>> Date: Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 18:01
> >>>>> Subject: AppSec Brasil 2010 contract draft
> >>>>> To: Kate Hartmann <kate.hartmann at owasp.org>
> >>>>> Cc: organizacao2010 <organizacao2010 at appsecbrasil.org>,
> >>>>> global_conference_committee
> >>>>> <global_conference_committee at lists.owasp.org>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hello Kate,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> please find attached the proposed contract for the company that will
> >>>>> handle the financials for AppSec Brasil 2010. Please review it and
> >>>>> tell us what the next steps are.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We already have one of the sponsors that wants us to send an invoice
> >>>>> and we need to have this agreement signed before we can do that.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Lucas
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Homo sapiens non urinat in ventum.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Owasp-board mailing list
> >>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
> >>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Eoin Keary
> >>> OWASP Global Board Member
> >>> OWASP Code Review Guide Lead Author
> >>>
> >>> http://asg.ie/
> >>> https://twitter.com/EoinKeary
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Homo sapiens non urinat in ventum.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Homo sapiens non urinat in ventum.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Homo sapiens non urinat in ventum.
>



-- 
Eoin Keary
OWASP Global Board Member
OWASP Code Review Guide Lead Author

http://asg.ie/
https://twitter.com/EoinKeary
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20100426/ed5f17f4/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Owasp-board mailing list