[Owasp-board] REQUEST FOR COMMENTS/RE: ASDR SoC Final Review

Paulo Coimbra paulo.coimbra at owasp.org
Fri Feb 20 15:36:21 UTC 2009

Hello Board, Committee, Leonardo and ASDR's reviewers,


As I am still waiting for Board's and/or Committee's response to the
question below posed and consequently I have kept this project within my
thoughts as I assume the ADSR SoC's phase is not closed, I find out another
question to which I would need  your insight. In fact, if at first I assumed
none payment was due to the reviewers, it eventually has turned out less
clear for me.


In actuality, although none review has been written down with the exception
of the self-assessment, as the reviewers have supported the project leader -
"mainly by discussing categories/subclasses and sharing their visions about
project's mid-long future" -, it maybe might be considered that the review
<http://owaspsoc2008.wordpress.com/2008/07/15/assessment-guidance/>  task
has been partially performed. Therefore, from my perspective, this situation
confronts us with the payment question to which I am requiring your
judgment. May I have it, please?  


Many thanks, best regards,

Paulo Coimbra,

 <https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Main_Page> OWASP Project Manager


From: Paulo Coimbra [mailto:paulo.coimbra at owasp.org] 
Sent: quinta-feira, 19 de Fevereiro de 2009 15:47
To: 'Leonardo Cavallari Militelli'
Cc: 'OWASP Foundation Board List';
'global_tools_and_project_committee at lists.owasp.org'
Importance: High


Hello Leonardo,


I thank your clear feedback regarding the ASDR status and I am glad to hear
that important progress have been made. I am also pleased to know that you
are thinking in pushing the project up the ladder in the next season of code
- as you know the guide's integration is an issue currently at stake and
maybe some efforts towards this direction can to this point be made.


As for the circumstances in which you have worked, I understand the
difficulty you have faced to find volunteers. The path we have followed,
under which we have allocated four reviewers to this project instead of the
usual two, definitely didn't work. We did so to get additional help because
we had anticipated the task's grandiosity but it seems now clear that we
have mixed reviewer's and contributor's roles.  I would say we need to learn
this lesson.


Regarding the SoC's payment, even if none review has been done except yours,
IMHO it could be evaluated given that 80% of the approved roadmap has been
accomplished and two extra-planned tasks have been performed, i.e. the
identification of the most important subclasses for each category and the
articles' cleaning. 


Therefore, I am carbon copying both the Board and the Project's Committee to
have their say on the issue. I am sure very soon we will receive the
appropriate response.


Many thanks, best regards,


Paulo Coimbra,

OWASP <https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Main_Page>  Project Manager


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20090220/4581e819/attachment-0002.html>

More information about the Owasp-board mailing list