[Owasp-board] Fw: filming in portugal...

dinis cruz dinis.cruz at owasp.org
Tue Oct 28 15:38:18 UTC 2008


Hey Tom, we have a positive vote on this one.

Can you talk with them asap and confirm the details and complete the
arrangement?

Put them in touch with the travel agency since they could handle the travel
for them (those 4000 USD they quoted included air travel right?)

Dinis

2008/10/27 Seba <seba at owasp.org>

> I vote YES to have it filmed. Regardless from which budget it comes
> from. The videos will support all projects and working groups. We have
> countless people regretting they can't make: this way they are
> involved.
> Seba
>
> On 10/27/08, dinis cruz <dinis.cruz at owasp.org> wrote:
> > I also agree that filming would be something we should definitely do for
> the
> > Summit:
> >
> >    -  It would give us a 15m presentation about each project that is
> being
> >    presented at the conference part (this would also make the presenters
> > focus
> >    much more on what they are presenting and allow for to maximize the
> >    investment made)
> >    - Would allow us to record some of the smaller training sessions
> (which
> >    again would be an amazing resource to our members)
> >    - It would give extra focus and pressure to the Working Sessions that
> we
> >    decide to film, and I specially like the fact that for some Working
> > Sessions
> >    we could have an 'on-the-record' 1h sessions
> >    - From the feedback we have from NYC (and the viewing numbers of the
> >    videos should be the final proof), these videos are a great way to add
> > value
> >    to our community and (again) to maximize the return of those
> > presentations
> >    - The price these guys are giving us is a very good one (and I don't
> mind
> >    if they stick a couple-seconds advert in front of it)
> >
> > The only prob is that I don't have any budget from the Summit original
> -150k
> > to spend on this.
> >
> > So I vote YES as long as this expense is marked as 'OWASP Board direct
> > expense' and not as a 'OWASP Summit EU' expense.
> >
> > Tom and Seba, can you vote again (taking into account that the budget is
> > coming centrally)
> >
> > Final comment on the Budget, at last count (using Kate's numbers) we were
> on
> > 400k in the bank (with already 100k from the summit paid), so we can
> easily
> > afford this (even assuming another 50kish from the summit and another
> 50kish
> > for the remaining of the SoC payments)
> >
> > Dinis
> >
> > 2008/10/24 Seba <seba at owasp.org>
> >
> >> absolutely!
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 9:18 PM, Tom Brennan <tomb at owasp.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Should we invest in filiming the summit? See below
> >>>
> >>> ------Original Message------
> >>> From: Tedd St Rain
> >>> To: dinis.cruz at owasp.org
> >>> Cc: tomb at owasp.org
> >>> Subject: filming in portugal...
> >>> Sent: Oct 24, 2008 3:16 PM
> >>>
> >>> hey dinis,
> >>>
> >>> sorry on the delay on getting back to you on filming the owasp
> >>> portugal... i 'am' able, and interested in helping you, and there's
> >>> only a few details... Airfare is 'still' rather affordable, so that
> >>> shouldn't be a problem... If you would be able to provide some
> >>> 'volunteer help' to assist me at the event, I can film the entire
> >>> conference for 'about' US$4,000, all inclusive of airfare,
> >>> accommodations, travel, labor, supplies, processing the video, and
> >>> then posting it to google video (as with NYC2008)... I said 'about',
> >>> because there's some 'unknown variables', ie: rising airfare, paid
> >>> help, possible foreign work permits, visas, etc... So, in reality $5k
> >>> is the maximum it would cost, but a bare-bones price of $4k is a more
> >>> reasonable expectation...
> >>>
> >>> So, if that works out okay for you, i'd be happy to come on board...
> >>> otherwise, i can still help you try and find someone locally, etc...
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>> 1) i have some questions about the event... i understand it's two
> >>> days of training, a day of working groups, and 2 days of the
> >>> conference... I also note that while the 'conference' portion is  "5
> >>> sessions", it's really just '2 tracks', plus the business track for
> >>> each (of 2) days. So, technically the conference portion is 'only in
> >>> three rooms' that need to be recorded? correct?
> >>>
> >>> 2) are there any sessions being presented in a foreign language
> >>> (besides english)?
> >>>
> >>> 3) if possible, i would suggest filming everything we can, including
> >>> some of the trainings and working groups. Usually what i prefer to do
> >>> with 'proprietary trainings', is to delay their release for at least
> >>> a year (to prevent a monetary conflict from preventing signups next
> >>> year, etc), but i still think they should be captured, if the
> >>> instructors agree...
> >>>
> >>> Call me if you have any other questions,
> >>>
> >>> Ted Strain
> >>> www.MediaArchives.com
> >>>
> >>> 1-562-427-2787 (pacific time zone)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Owasp-board mailing list
> >>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
> >>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Owasp-board mailing list
> >> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
> >> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> --
> Sent from my mobile device
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20081028/019e9452/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Owasp-board mailing list