[Owasp-board] OWASP Con Panels?

Dave Wichers dave.wichers at owasp.org
Sun Mar 18 15:46:53 UTC 2007



What do you think about Andrew's panel proposals?


There's been some traffic about topic 1 lately so seems good to discuss.


I'm a big fan of idea #2 as I totally agree, but Jeff has always held that
position, that its 'too hard'.


If we like these proposals, then I need to identify some panel moderators
quickly that can get these organized, (mainly find the panelists).


Do we want to have Gunnar be our continued tried and true moderator for one
of them. I might be able to do the other, but I'd really like someone else
to step up (besides me or Dinis :-) ).







From: Andrew van der Stock [mailto:vanderaj at owasp.org] 
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 9:05 AM
To: Dave Wichers; OWASP Board
Subject: Re: [Owasp-board] Need Help with OWASP Italy Agenda


Panel 1: Public site vulnerability research - good or evil? Ethics gradient
meet Springer; many sites like sl.ackers.org divulge a great deal of
information about XSS attacks on huge public websites. Discuss.

Panel 2: What is needed to fix web app sec vulnerabilities once and for all?
Why are we still handling the same crappy issues (XSS, SQL injection, etc)
we saw back in 2000, with a few new friends. Why are things not getting
better. Discuss ways to improve webappsec. 


Owasp-board mailing list
Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20070318/816640b6/attachment-0002.html>

More information about the Owasp-board mailing list