[Owasp-board] Klockwork covers OWASP Top Ten -- Riiight

Dinis Cruz dinis at ddplus.net
Mon Jan 29 15:19:29 UTC 2007


>
> On 1/29/07, Dave Wichers <dave.wichers at owasp.org> wrote:
> >
> >  I think we should. Should we say in the brand usage rules that if you
> > say something like we look for the OWASP Top 10, or cover the Top 10 or
> > whatever, you MUST include a reference to a publicly accessible page that
> > 'explains' how well you 'think' you cover each element of the Top 10? This
> > would encourage vendors to be open about their claims, or not abuse the
> > brand. I think the openness would be good for the business.
> >
> This is a good idea

> If they make claims that are false, their customers will call them on it.
>

And WE (OWASP) should also call on them, I really hope we get a SpoC project
to sort this branding issue

Dinis

-Dave
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* owasp-board-bounces at lists.owasp.org [mailto:
> owasp-board-bounces at lists.owasp.org] *On Behalf Of *Jeff Williams
> *Sent:* Monday, January 29, 2007 9:44 AM
> *To:* owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
> *Subject:* [Owasp-board] Klockwork covers OWASP Top Ten -- Riiight
>
>
>
>
> http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/story.aspx?guid=CC5BE970CB9B428B8D5A60E2079EA6AE&siteid=mktw&dist=nbk
>
>
>
> Do you think we should include a paragraph in the new Top Ten that
> basically summarizes our brand usage rules?
>
>
>
> --Jeff
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Owasp-board mailing list
> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
> http://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Dinis Cruz
> Chief OWASP Evangelist, Are you a member yet?
> http://www.owasp.org
>



-- 
Dinis Cruz
Chief OWASP Evangelist, Are you a member yet?
http://www.owasp.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20070129/bbfef619/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Owasp-board mailing list