[Owasp-board] Spring Of Code
dinis at ddplus.net
Wed Jan 24 18:41:02 UTC 2007
You should be reading more carefully the last newsletter :)
Here are details about the current OWASP board:
The reason you (and everybody else) need to compete is to make sure
that SpoC is a fair and open exercise.
That said, if you look at the selection criteria for the AoC (and SpoC
should be very similar if not the same)
you will see that you (and any active OWASP project leader) have a
very high probability to have your proposal(s) accepted
On 1/24/07, Eoin <eoinkeary at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Dinis,
> Funny that I have to compete with other people to get sponsorship for a
> guide i started.
> But i will submit to the SpoC for the Code review guide.
> May I ask who is currently on the OWASP board and who selects them?
> Thanks again,
> On 24/01/07, Dinis Cruz <dinis at ddplus.net> wrote:
> > Hi Eoin,
> > Of course that the Code Review can apply to the SpoC (Spring of Code),
> > in fact I would be surprised if if didn't receive 1, 2 or even 3
> > sponshorships :) . It will all depend on the quality of the
> > proposals. As project leader you should be thinking on how you want
> > that to work
> > I also would like to have a proposal on the 'very discussed'
> > If I was you, this is how I would aproach it:
> > 1) ask the question 'in an ideal world what resources I would like
> > to have in this project for the next 3 months'
> > 2) send that plan to the mailing list with your ideas projects and
> > ask for participants (you can also hand pick them if you know who you
> > want). I'm assuming that one proposal will be comming from you
> > 3) appy to the SpoC
> > Yesterday, we had a Owasp board conference call where we decided to
> > allocate $100,000 USD to the SpoC (final details still to be defined)
> > so we will be able to increase substancially the number of
> > sponshorships given.
> > In principle I will be the one organizing the SpoC and the current
> > plan is to make the first anoucement in the 1st of Feb.
> > Dinis Cruz
> > Chief OWASP Evangelist
> > http://www.owasp.org
> > On 1/24/07, Eoin < eoinkeary at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > Can the Code review guide be considered for the Spring of Code or seen
> > > there is momentum behind it already it is too "far-gone"?
> > > I shall apply for it through the usual channels. I don't know who will
> > > the coordinator as this time I wish to be tech lead (I regret not being
> > > lead for the Testing guide), maybe Dave Witchers or Jeff (Dinis has too
> > > much to do :0) ).
> > > what you guys think?
> > >
> > > Also
> > >
> > > We need to think about integration into the Metrics project. (or is
> > > dead, not much activity on the site).
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Eoin Keary OWASP - Ireland
> > > http://www.owasp.org/local/ireland.html
> > > http://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Testing_Project
> > >
> > --
> Eoin Keary OWASP - Ireland
Chief OWASP Evangelist, Are you a member yet?
More information about the Owasp-board