[Governance] Transparency Policy
bil.corry at owasp.org
Thu Jun 19 14:48:28 UTC 2014
Thanks Josh, I've updated the violation section based on your suggestion. I also added the whistleblower exception, as our whistleblower policy states it is a confidential process.
From: Josh Sokol [mailto:josh.sokol at owasp.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 4:06 PM
To: Bil Corry
Cc: OWASP GOVERNING
Subject: Re: [Governance] Transparency Policy
I really like where this is going. It reads similar to a data classification plan and maybe we should even consider labeling documents based on the levels outlined. When I have some time, I will try to add additional examples for consideration. In the meantime, my only advice may be to rephrase the policy violations section at the bottom more along the lines of "including the possibility of suspension or revocation of membership, exclusion from OWASP events and mailing lists, or other such action as determined."
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 5:18 AM, Bil Corry <bil.corry at owasp.org> wrote:
I am proposing we create (and have the BoD adopt) a policy on transparency to clarify the information that should never be shared publicly.
To that end, I've created an initial draft, which you can find here:
I'm requesting discussion and feedback on the draft, along with additional exclusions (I only started with two).
Thank you for your time in advance,
Governance mailing list
Governance at lists.owasp.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Governance