[Governance] Formal Request to Revoke Michael Coates
christian.heinrich at cmlh.id.au
Thu Jun 19 09:48:11 UTC 2014
I would like to draw your attention to "Both you and Michael (OWASP Chair)
work[ed] at Mozilla and this is a conflict of interest." within
In relation to Michael intended action against Dinis Cruz i.e.
http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/governance/2014-June/000413.html, I would
like to highlight that Yvan Boily is also an employee of Mozilla and
therefore Michael Coates in his position OWASP Chair has violated the
following Code of Ethics:
- To maintain and affirm our objectivity and independence;
- To reject inappropriate pressure from industry or others;
- To avoid relationships that impair — or may appear to impair —
OWASP's objectivity and independence.
Of note to, *Yvan Boily threaten me with the exact same action but has been
unable to produce any evidence which is disputed or a defence readily
Furthermore, *Michael Coates has never produced any supporting evidence in
relation to my membership being revoked* i.e.
I therefore formally request the following:
1. The OWASP Membership of Michael Coates is revoked with immediate effect
due to his conflict of interest with Mozilla and therefore Yvan Boily and
the violation of the code of ethics.
2. The investigation against Dinis Cruz ceases due to the precedence set
with the bias relationship of Paulo with Dinis as shown during the OWASP
Google Hacking Inquiry.
3. My revoked membership is restored until Michael Coates is able to
provide the supporting evidence.
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Michael Coates <michael.coates at owasp.org>
> Governance, Martin,
> This is an ongoing issue and the contributions are against are code of
> ethics and have happened repeatedly. We have tried to work with him to no
> avail. His membership has been revoked twice before. I belief it is time to
> ban this email address due to repeated violations.
> The email below is yet another recent example along with the recent flair
> up on the testing alias that has been discussed by multiple people here:
> I believe OWASP should focus on our mission of application security and
> stop this bickering. In this unfortunate situation it seems there is no way
> to move on as we've tried many times. It is unacceptable to permit these
> types of actions and we must make changes to address them.
> In addition to the comments below we also have this thread:
> Michael Coates
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Governance