[Governance] My OWASP Membership
christian.heinrich at cmlh.id.au
Sat Feb 22 04:01:06 UTC 2014
The issue with Chris Gatford was resolved with the inquiry undertaken
by Tom Brennan.
I am not asking the OWASP Board to be judge or jury, rather for you to
assist me with a number of very conservative clarifications of my
reputation with Brad Causey, Andre Ludwig, etc so they can act as my
referees and ambassadors within OWASP in the future.
I would like my reinstatement deferred until Martin conclude the
review of my termination proceedings i.e.
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
> I believe that you are correct in your assumption that if your membership
> was reinstated, the Board would likely not assist you further in the closure
> you seek. We are not a judge or a jury. We are a group of volunteers
> focusing on the problem of application insecurity. And yes, I agree that
> any efforts to pursue others for the sake of closure would likely put you on
> the other side of the OWASP Code of Ethics, resulting in your termination
> yet again. From your email, it sounds like your decision is to rescind your
> request to have your membership reinstated, is that correct? I want to
> ensure that we are correctly interpreting what you are saying here. Thanks.
More information about the Governance