[Global_industry_committee] anyone care to review this "OWASPSurvey" document/template

Eoin eoin.keary at owasp.org
Thu Jan 6 06:33:53 EST 2011


Please include me on this meeting.
I also would like to know what GIC has planned for 2011?

Eoin



On 6 January 2011 02:32, Yiannis Pavlosoglou <yiannis at owasp.org> wrote:

> We debated that a few days back and there are two factors:
>
> a. we don't want to loose the momentum of the opening day (i.e. we
> have to actually go and do work on what comes out of that session)
> b. I don't know if everyone will be there until Thursday. Even I have
> a problem committing to the whole week which I am trying solve.
>
> That's the bad news; the good news is that there is going to be at
> least one follow up meeting for industry, which you definately part
> of. Plus the meeting for just committee members, you should be fine...
>
> Thank you,
>
> Yiannis
>
> On 6 January 2011 00:58, Rex Booth <rex.booth at owasp.org> wrote:
> > Can we move it to Thursday so I can be there?
> >
> > On 1/5/2011 5:10 PM, dinis cruz wrote:
> >> As per Yiannis request we will put GIC sessions on Tue afternoon, so
> >> you can plan your invites around that
> >>
> >> Is that OK?
> >>
> >>
> >> Dinis Cruz
> >>
> >> On 5 Jan 2011, at 18:23, David Campbell<dcampbell at owasp.org>  wrote:
> >>
> >>> Echo this sentiment.  I'm trying to invite mobile players but need a
> >>> more concrete agenda to legitimize the effort.
> >>>
> >>> DC
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 1/5/2011 2:44, Colin Watson wrote:
> >>>> Eoin
> >>>>
> >>>> This would be good to discuss further at the summit, but I'll have a
> >>>> proper look in the next couple of days.
> >>>>
> >>>> The summit team has been doing a fantastic job - congratulations.
> >>>> Regarding ISC2 et al, I was going to post a message asking if the
> >>>> Industry Committee should be inviting folk to the summit (and making
> >>>> sure that doesn't overlap with member/sponsor/other contact
> >>>> initiatives), but before Christmas I held off, because there wasn't
> >>>> an
> >>>> agenda for people to look at.  It seems Yiannis has raised this
> >>>> already (message below).
> >>>>
> >>>> To invite people from academia, industry and government, we really
> >>>> need a day-by-day timetable first, as most will probably only want to
> >>>> attend for a day or two.  And then, the timetable can't change!
> >>>>
> >>>> Colin
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 5 January 2011 09:11, Yiannis Pavlosoglou<yiannis at owasp.org>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> Not that I know of. We have confirmed VB as a speaker for what is
> >>>>> to become
> >>>>> the Tuesday afternoon industry session. I believe he is attending
> >>>>> on his own
> >>>>> expenses. Lorna is handling that, she can fill you in.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Dinis, what would really help is a timetable (as per my phone
> >>>>> call). That
> >>>>> way we would something to pitch, people could pick what days to
> >>>>> attend,
> >>>>> normal summit matters!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thank you,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yiannis
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 5 Jan 2011 03:32, "dinis cruz"<dinis.cruz at owasp.org>  wrote:
> >>>>>> For reference here are the current Summit sponsorships options:
> >>>>>> http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Summit_2011_Corporate_Sponsorship
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Dinis Cruz
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 5 January 2011 00:56, Tom Brennan<tomb at owasp.org>  wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Yiannis is ISC2 going to be a supporter for the Summit? (Since
> >>>>>>> you are on
> >>>>>>> the advisory board... You get the liaison question). Would be
> >>>>>>> great to
> >>>>>>> have
> >>>>>>> them promote our event to the followers
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>>> From: Yiannis Pavlosoglou<yiannis at owasp.org>
> >>>>>>> Sender: global_industry_committee-bounces at lists.owasp.org
> >>>>>>> Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 21:14:15
> >>>>>>> To: Jeff Williams<jeff.williams at owasp.org>
> >>>>>>> Cc: Dave Wichers<dave.wichers at owasp.org>; Matt Tesauro<
> >>>>>>> matt.tesauro at owasp.org>; Global_industry_committee<
> >>>>>>> Global_industry_committee at lists.owasp.org>
> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Global_industry_committee] anyone care to review
> >>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>> "OWASP
> >>>>>>> Survey" document/template
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi Eoin,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Great work; I am still going through it, at the trade-off of
> >>>>>>> potentially (contributing very little changes back), do you want
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>> ISC2 to be involved?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thank you,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Yiannis
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> PS. No problem in industry driving this.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 4 January 2011 20:55, Jeff Williams<jeff.williams at owasp.org>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Eoin,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Can you forward the specific survey objectives? I don’t ha
> >>>>>>>> ve a good
> >>>>>>>> idea
> >>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>> the outcomes that you expect, and so I can’t evaluate whet
> >>>>>>>> her these are
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>> right questions.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The kinds of questions a survey author should create are based
> >>>>>>>> on two
> >>>>>>>> things: the objectives of the survey and the information to be
> >>>>>>>> collected.
> >>>>>>>> Know kinds of information needed then turn those research
> >>>>>>>> objectives
> >>>>>>>> into
> >>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>> set of “information requirements.” From here, one can crea
> >>>>>>>> te questions
> >>>>>>> that
> >>>>>>>> will produce that information (Brace 2004, 11-12). An accurate
> >>>>>>>> survey
> >>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>> one
> >>>>>>>> where the questions collect the data in a reliable and valid way.
> >>>>>>>> http://s3.amazonaws.com/SurveyMonkeyFiles/SmartSurvey.pdf
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --Jeff
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> From: eoinkeary at gmail.com [mailto:eoinkeary at gmail.com] On
> >>>>>>>> Behalf Of
> >>>>>>>> Eoin
> >>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 11:53 AM
> >>>>>>>> To: Global_industry_committee
> >>>>>>>> Cc: David Campbell; Tom Brennan; Seba; Jeff Williams; Dave
> >>>>>>>> Wichers;
> >>>>>>>> Matt
> >>>>>>>> Tesauro; dinis cruz
> >>>>>>>> Subject: anyone care to review this "OWASP Survey" document/
> >>>>>>>> template
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> David and myself put this together.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Would appreciate your views on the questions and also the type
> >>>>>>>> of data
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>> questions will yield.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Was to be done with ISC2 partnership but not sure about this.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I believe an e-survey would suit best, such this is a template.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> This should be driven by the industry committee in terms of
> >>>>>>>> delivery
> >>>>>>>> but
> >>>>>>>> needs some board approval, stringent review and overall
> >>>>>>>> agrrment on the
> >>>>>>>> objective and content.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> thoughts?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Happy to discuss at summit.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Eoin Keary
> >>>>>>>> OWASP Global Board Member
> >>>>>>>> OWASP Code Review Guide Lead Author
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Sent from my i-Transmogrifier
> >>>>>>>> http://asg.ie/
> >>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/EoinKeary
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>> Global_industry_committee mailing list
> >>>>>>>> Global_industry_committee at lists.owasp.org
> >>>>>>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/
> >>>>>>>> global_industry_committee
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> Dr. Yiannis Pavlosoglou
> >>>>>>> OWASP Global Industry Committee
> >>>>>>> http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Global_Industry_Committee
> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>> Global_industry_committee mailing list
> >>>>>>> Global_industry_committee at lists.owasp.org
> >>>>>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global_industry_committee
> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>> Global_industry_committee mailing list
> >>>>>>> Global_industry_committee at lists.owasp.org
> >>>>>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global_industry_committee
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Global_industry_committee mailing list
> >>>>> Global_industry_committee at lists.owasp.org
> >>>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global_industry_committee
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Global_industry_committee mailing list
> >>>> Global_industry_committee at lists.owasp.org
> >>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global_industry_committee
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Global_industry_committee mailing list
> >>> Global_industry_committee at lists.owasp.org
> >>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global_industry_committee
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Global_industry_committee mailing list
> >> Global_industry_committee at lists.owasp.org
> >> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global_industry_committee
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Global_industry_committee mailing list
> > Global_industry_committee at lists.owasp.org
> > https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global_industry_committee
> >
>
>
>
> --
>  Dr. Yiannis Pavlosoglou
> OWASP Global Industry Committee
> http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Global_Industry_Committee
> _______________________________________________
> Global_industry_committee mailing list
> Global_industry_committee at lists.owasp.org
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global_industry_committee
>



-- 
Eoin Keary
OWASP Global Board Member
OWASP Code Review Guide Lead Author

Sent from my i-Transmogrifier
http://asg.ie/
https://twitter.com/EoinKeary
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/global_industry_committee/attachments/20110106/7eb4397b/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the Global_industry_committee mailing list