[Global_industry_committee] anyone care to review this "OWASPSurvey" document/template

Rex Booth rex.booth at owasp.org
Wed Jan 5 22:06:16 EST 2011


no problem - works for me.  I'll see you on Wednesday!


On 1/5/2011 9:32 PM, Yiannis Pavlosoglou wrote:
> We debated that a few days back and there are two factors:
>
> a. we don't want to loose the momentum of the opening day (i.e. we
> have to actually go and do work on what comes out of that session)
> b. I don't know if everyone will be there until Thursday. Even I have
> a problem committing to the whole week which I am trying solve.
>
> That's the bad news; the good news is that there is going to be at
> least one follow up meeting for industry, which you definately part
> of. Plus the meeting for just committee members, you should be fine...
>
> Thank you,
>
> Yiannis
>
> On 6 January 2011 00:58, Rex Booth<rex.booth at owasp.org>  wrote:
>> Can we move it to Thursday so I can be there?
>>
>> On 1/5/2011 5:10 PM, dinis cruz wrote:
>>> As per Yiannis request we will put GIC sessions on Tue afternoon, so
>>> you can plan your invites around that
>>>
>>> Is that OK?
>>>
>>>
>>> Dinis Cruz
>>>
>>> On 5 Jan 2011, at 18:23, David Campbell<dcampbell at owasp.org>    wrote:
>>>
>>>> Echo this sentiment.  I'm trying to invite mobile players but need a
>>>> more concrete agenda to legitimize the effort.
>>>>
>>>> DC
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 1/5/2011 2:44, Colin Watson wrote:
>>>>> Eoin
>>>>>
>>>>> This would be good to discuss further at the summit, but I'll have a
>>>>> proper look in the next couple of days.
>>>>>
>>>>> The summit team has been doing a fantastic job - congratulations.
>>>>> Regarding ISC2 et al, I was going to post a message asking if the
>>>>> Industry Committee should be inviting folk to the summit (and making
>>>>> sure that doesn't overlap with member/sponsor/other contact
>>>>> initiatives), but before Christmas I held off, because there wasn't
>>>>> an
>>>>> agenda for people to look at.  It seems Yiannis has raised this
>>>>> already (message below).
>>>>>
>>>>> To invite people from academia, industry and government, we really
>>>>> need a day-by-day timetable first, as most will probably only want to
>>>>> attend for a day or two.  And then, the timetable can't change!
>>>>>
>>>>> Colin
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5 January 2011 09:11, Yiannis Pavlosoglou<yiannis at owasp.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Not that I know of. We have confirmed VB as a speaker for what is
>>>>>> to become
>>>>>> the Tuesday afternoon industry session. I believe he is attending
>>>>>> on his own
>>>>>> expenses. Lorna is handling that, she can fill you in.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dinis, what would really help is a timetable (as per my phone
>>>>>> call). That
>>>>>> way we would something to pitch, people could pick what days to
>>>>>> attend,
>>>>>> normal summit matters!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yiannis
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5 Jan 2011 03:32, "dinis cruz"<dinis.cruz at owasp.org>    wrote:
>>>>>>> For reference here are the current Summit sponsorships options:
>>>>>>> http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Summit_2011_Corporate_Sponsorship
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dinis Cruz
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 5 January 2011 00:56, Tom Brennan<tomb at owasp.org>    wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yiannis is ISC2 going to be a supporter for the Summit? (Since
>>>>>>>> you are on
>>>>>>>> the advisory board... You get the liaison question). Would be
>>>>>>>> great to
>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>> them promote our event to the followers
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>> From: Yiannis Pavlosoglou<yiannis at owasp.org>
>>>>>>>> Sender: global_industry_committee-bounces at lists.owasp.org
>>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 21:14:15
>>>>>>>> To: Jeff Williams<jeff.williams at owasp.org>
>>>>>>>> Cc: Dave Wichers<dave.wichers at owasp.org>; Matt Tesauro<
>>>>>>>> matt.tesauro at owasp.org>; Global_industry_committee<
>>>>>>>> Global_industry_committee at lists.owasp.org>
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Global_industry_committee] anyone care to review
>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>> "OWASP
>>>>>>>> Survey" document/template
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Eoin,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Great work; I am still going through it, at the trade-off of
>>>>>>>> potentially (contributing very little changes back), do you want
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> ISC2 to be involved?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yiannis
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> PS. No problem in industry driving this.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 4 January 2011 20:55, Jeff Williams<jeff.williams at owasp.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Eoin,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Can you forward the specific survey objectives? I don’t ha
>>>>>>>>> ve a good
>>>>>>>>> idea
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> the outcomes that you expect, and so I can’t evaluate whet
>>>>>>>>> her these are
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> right questions.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The kinds of questions a survey author should create are based
>>>>>>>>> on two
>>>>>>>>> things: the objectives of the survey and the information to be
>>>>>>>>> collected.
>>>>>>>>> Know kinds of information needed then turn those research
>>>>>>>>> objectives
>>>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>> set of “information requirements.” From here, one can crea
>>>>>>>>> te questions
>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>> will produce that information (Brace 2004, 11-12). An accurate
>>>>>>>>> survey
>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>> where the questions collect the data in a reliable and valid way.
>>>>>>>>> http://s3.amazonaws.com/SurveyMonkeyFiles/SmartSurvey.pdf
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --Jeff
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> From: eoinkeary at gmail.com [mailto:eoinkeary at gmail.com] On
>>>>>>>>> Behalf Of
>>>>>>>>> Eoin
>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 11:53 AM
>>>>>>>>> To: Global_industry_committee
>>>>>>>>> Cc: David Campbell; Tom Brennan; Seba; Jeff Williams; Dave
>>>>>>>>> Wichers;
>>>>>>>>> Matt
>>>>>>>>> Tesauro; dinis cruz
>>>>>>>>> Subject: anyone care to review this "OWASP Survey" document/
>>>>>>>>> template
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> David and myself put this together.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Would appreciate your views on the questions and also the type
>>>>>>>>> of data
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> questions will yield.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Was to be done with ISC2 partnership but not sure about this.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I believe an e-survey would suit best, such this is a template.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This should be driven by the industry committee in terms of
>>>>>>>>> delivery
>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>> needs some board approval, stringent review and overall
>>>>>>>>> agrrment on the
>>>>>>>>> objective and content.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> thoughts?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Happy to discuss at summit.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Eoin Keary
>>>>>>>>> OWASP Global Board Member
>>>>>>>>> OWASP Code Review Guide Lead Author
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sent from my i-Transmogrifier
>>>>>>>>> http://asg.ie/
>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/EoinKeary
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Global_industry_committee mailing list
>>>>>>>>> Global_industry_committee at lists.owasp.org
>>>>>>>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/
>>>>>>>>> global_industry_committee
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Dr. Yiannis Pavlosoglou
>>>>>>>> OWASP Global Industry Committee
>>>>>>>> http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Global_Industry_Committee
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Global_industry_committee mailing list
>>>>>>>> Global_industry_committee at lists.owasp.org
>>>>>>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global_industry_committee
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Global_industry_committee mailing list
>>>>>>>> Global_industry_committee at lists.owasp.org
>>>>>>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global_industry_committee
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Global_industry_committee mailing list
>>>>>> Global_industry_committee at lists.owasp.org
>>>>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global_industry_committee
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Global_industry_committee mailing list
>>>>> Global_industry_committee at lists.owasp.org
>>>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global_industry_committee
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Global_industry_committee mailing list
>>>> Global_industry_committee at lists.owasp.org
>>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global_industry_committee
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Global_industry_committee mailing list
>>> Global_industry_committee at lists.owasp.org
>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global_industry_committee
>> _______________________________________________
>> Global_industry_committee mailing list
>> Global_industry_committee at lists.owasp.org
>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global_industry_committee
>>
>
>



More information about the Global_industry_committee mailing list