[Global_industry_committee] anyone care to review this "OWASPSurvey" document/template

dinis cruz dinis.cruz at owasp.org
Wed Jan 5 17:10:09 EST 2011


As per Yiannis request we will put GIC sessions on Tue afternoon, so
you can plan your invites around that

Is that OK?


Dinis Cruz

On 5 Jan 2011, at 18:23, David Campbell <dcampbell at owasp.org> wrote:

> Echo this sentiment.  I'm trying to invite mobile players but need a
> more concrete agenda to legitimize the effort.
>
> DC
>
>
> On 1/5/2011 2:44, Colin Watson wrote:
>> Eoin
>>
>> This would be good to discuss further at the summit, but I'll have a
>> proper look in the next couple of days.
>>
>> The summit team has been doing a fantastic job - congratulations.
>> Regarding ISC2 et al, I was going to post a message asking if the
>> Industry Committee should be inviting folk to the summit (and making
>> sure that doesn't overlap with member/sponsor/other contact
>> initiatives), but before Christmas I held off, because there wasn't
>> an
>> agenda for people to look at.  It seems Yiannis has raised this
>> already (message below).
>>
>> To invite people from academia, industry and government, we really
>> need a day-by-day timetable first, as most will probably only want to
>> attend for a day or two.  And then, the timetable can't change!
>>
>> Colin
>>
>>
>> On 5 January 2011 09:11, Yiannis Pavlosoglou <yiannis at owasp.org>
>> wrote:
>>> Not that I know of. We have confirmed VB as a speaker for what is
>>> to become
>>> the Tuesday afternoon industry session. I believe he is attending
>>> on his own
>>> expenses. Lorna is handling that, she can fill you in.
>>>
>>> Dinis, what would really help is a timetable (as per my phone
>>> call). That
>>> way we would something to pitch, people could pick what days to
>>> attend,
>>> normal summit matters!
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> Yiannis
>>>
>>> On 5 Jan 2011 03:32, "dinis cruz" <dinis.cruz at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>> For reference here are the current Summit sponsorships options:
>>>> http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Summit_2011_Corporate_Sponsorship
>>>>
>>>> Dinis Cruz
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 5 January 2011 00:56, Tom Brennan <tomb at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yiannis is ISC2 going to be a supporter for the Summit? (Since
>>>>> you are on
>>>>> the advisory board... You get the liaison question). Would be
>>>>> great to
>>>>> have
>>>>> them promote our event to the followers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Yiannis Pavlosoglou <yiannis at owasp.org>
>>>>> Sender: global_industry_committee-bounces at lists.owasp.org
>>>>> Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 21:14:15
>>>>> To: Jeff Williams<jeff.williams at owasp.org>
>>>>> Cc: Dave Wichers<dave.wichers at owasp.org>; Matt Tesauro<
>>>>> matt.tesauro at owasp.org>; Global_industry_committee<
>>>>> Global_industry_committee at lists.owasp.org>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Global_industry_committee] anyone care to review
>>>>> this
>>>>> "OWASP
>>>>> Survey" document/template
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Eoin,
>>>>>
>>>>> Great work; I am still going through it, at the trade-off of
>>>>> potentially (contributing very little changes back), do you want
>>>>> the
>>>>> ISC2 to be involved?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>
>>>>> Yiannis
>>>>>
>>>>> PS. No problem in industry driving this.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4 January 2011 20:55, Jeff Williams <jeff.williams at owasp.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Eoin,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you forward the specific survey objectives? I don’t ha
>>>>>> ve a good
>>>>>> idea
>>>>> of
>>>>>> the outcomes that you expect, and so I can’t evaluate whet
>>>>>> her these are
>>>>> the
>>>>>> right questions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The kinds of questions a survey author should create are based
>>>>>> on two
>>>>>> things: the objectives of the survey and the information to be
>>>>>> collected.
>>>>>> Know kinds of information needed then turn those research
>>>>>> objectives
>>>>>> into
>>>>> a
>>>>>> set of “information requirements.” From here, one can crea
>>>>>> te questions
>>>>> that
>>>>>> will produce that information (Brace 2004, 11-12). An accurate
>>>>>> survey
>>>>>> is
>>>>> one
>>>>>> where the questions collect the data in a reliable and valid way.
>>>>>> http://s3.amazonaws.com/SurveyMonkeyFiles/SmartSurvey.pdf
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --Jeff
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: eoinkeary at gmail.com [mailto:eoinkeary at gmail.com] On
>>>>>> Behalf Of
>>>>>> Eoin
>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 11:53 AM
>>>>>> To: Global_industry_committee
>>>>>> Cc: David Campbell; Tom Brennan; Seba; Jeff Williams; Dave
>>>>>> Wichers;
>>>>>> Matt
>>>>>> Tesauro; dinis cruz
>>>>>> Subject: anyone care to review this "OWASP Survey" document/
>>>>>> template
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> David and myself put this together.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Would appreciate your views on the questions and also the type
>>>>>> of data
>>>>> the
>>>>>> questions will yield.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Was to be done with ISC2 partnership but not sure about this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I believe an e-survey would suit best, such this is a template.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This should be driven by the industry committee in terms of
>>>>>> delivery
>>>>>> but
>>>>>> needs some board approval, stringent review and overall
>>>>>> agrrment on the
>>>>>> objective and content.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thoughts?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Happy to discuss at summit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Eoin Keary
>>>>>> OWASP Global Board Member
>>>>>> OWASP Code Review Guide Lead Author
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sent from my i-Transmogrifier
>>>>>> http://asg.ie/
>>>>>> https://twitter.com/EoinKeary
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Global_industry_committee mailing list
>>>>>> Global_industry_committee at lists.owasp.org
>>>>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/
>>>>>> global_industry_committee
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Dr. Yiannis Pavlosoglou
>>>>> OWASP Global Industry Committee
>>>>> http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Global_Industry_Committee
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Global_industry_committee mailing list
>>>>> Global_industry_committee at lists.owasp.org
>>>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global_industry_committee
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Global_industry_committee mailing list
>>>>> Global_industry_committee at lists.owasp.org
>>>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global_industry_committee
>>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Global_industry_committee mailing list
>>> Global_industry_committee at lists.owasp.org
>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global_industry_committee
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Global_industry_committee mailing list
>> Global_industry_committee at lists.owasp.org
>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global_industry_committee
> _______________________________________________
> Global_industry_committee mailing list
> Global_industry_committee at lists.owasp.org
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global_industry_committee


More information about the Global_industry_committee mailing list