[Global_industry_committee] GIC Chair

Joe bernik at gmail.com
Mon Feb 14 23:16:07 EST 2011


Jim,

Let's hear your take on merging these two committees. We are open to the idea though want to vet it with the Board and other Committee chairs.

Best regards, be warm.

Joe

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Manico [mailto:jim.manico at owasp.org] 
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 11:09 PM
To: Georg Heß
Cc: David Campbell; Tom Brennan; Rex Booth; Eoin; Joe Bernik; Colin Watson; Alexander Fry; SherifKoussa; Lorna Alamri; Global_industry_committee; OWASPFoundation Board List; Justin Clarke; Jerry Hoff; Doug Wilson
Subject: Re: [Global_industry_committee] GIC Chair

Adding Doug Wilson and Jerry Hoff to this thread

-Jim Manico
http://manico.net

On Feb 14, 2011, at 10:56 PM, Georg Heß <georg.hess at artofdefence.com> wrote:

> Same here
> 
> --
> Georg Hess
> 
> On 2/14/11 12:37 PM, David Campbell wrote:
>> No objections here.
>> 
>> DC
>> 
>> 
>> On 2/14/2011 12:58, Tom Brennan wrote:
>>> I just hung up (yes I use the phone/skype more than emails for 
>>> OWASP) with the Global Connections Committee (sounds so official) 
>>> but after talking to Jim Manico (the connections chair) we have 
>>> another selfless effort for the good of OWASP and recommendation for 
>>> consideration at the 4pm EST call today
>>> 
>>> Merge the connections committee into the industry committee.
>>> 
>>> Step#1 look at the list:  http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Global_Committee_Pages  <-- no really its updated.
>>> 
>>> Step#2 we merge Connections Members into Industry Committee
>>> 
>>> Step #3 we eliminate the connections committee on the wiki (quick 
>>> edit) that has a fuzzy mission (worked great for the Summit)
>>> 
>>> Step #4 we have two NEW members passion filled to help the outreach and progress that bring business and relationships.
>>> 
>>> Please add this to the agenda at the 4pm EST call 800.851.3547 
>>> x3738751
>>> 
>>> As one of the topics is a GIC chair, then the members of the committee can vote in the GIC Chair.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Feb 14, 2011, at 11:44 AM, Rex Booth wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I think the latter structure is what's needed in order to maximize outreach potential.
>>>> 
>>>> That said, I don't think that structure has an impact on how the chair is chosen.
>>>> 
>>>> On 2/14/2011 11:32 AM, Eoin wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> There seems to be interest in the position which is great as I keep saying "Industry is where OWASP can gain traction".
>>>>> 
>>>>> The individuals whom have expressed interest in the chair role are David Campbell (I may stand corrected here), Rex Booth and Joe Bernik.
>>>>> 
>>>>> We have two options in terms of structure as I believe the committee once empowered by new OWASP bylaws may grow rather large.
>>>>> We discussed this in Portugal on Tuesday.....
>>>>> 
>>>>> Option 1: Vote for a new chair, democratic and transparent.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Option 2: Iinstall a chair with overarching responsibility of 
>>>>> cross-committee and board communication but also form industry vertical committees represented by individuals from industry: Finance/Banking, Energy, Health, Gov, Transport? etc The vertical reps will need to actually be working in these industries but also understand the issues facing their own area of expertise.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Eoin Keary
>>>>> OWASP Global Board Member
>>>>> OWASP Code Review Guide Lead Author
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sent from my i-Transmogrifier
>>>>> http://asg.ie/
>>>>> https://twitter.com/EoinKeary
>> 



More information about the Global_industry_committee mailing list