[Global_industry_committee] GIC Chair

Alexander Fry alexander.fry at owasp.org
Mon Feb 14 15:56:41 EST 2011


Sounds good.

On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Georg Heß <georg.hess at artofdefence.com>wrote:

> Same here
>
> --
> Georg Hess
>
> On 2/14/11 12:37 PM, David Campbell wrote:
> > No objections here.
> >
> > DC
> >
> >
> > On 2/14/2011 12:58, Tom Brennan wrote:
> >> I just hung up (yes I use the phone/skype more than emails for OWASP)
> with the Global Connections Committee (sounds so official) but after talking
> to Jim Manico (the connections chair) we have another selfless effort for
> the good of OWASP and recommendation for consideration at the 4pm EST call
> today
> >>
> >>  Merge the connections committee into the industry committee.
> >>
> >> Step#1 look at the list:
> http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Global_Committee_Pages  <-- no really its
> updated.
> >>
> >> Step#2 we merge Connections Members into Industry Committee
> >>
> >> Step #3 we eliminate the connections committee on the wiki (quick edit)
> that has a fuzzy mission (worked great for the Summit)
> >>
> >> Step #4 we have two NEW members passion filled to help the outreach and
> progress that bring business and relationships.
> >>
> >> Please add this to the agenda at the 4pm EST call 800.851.3547 x3738751
> >>
> >> As one of the topics is a GIC chair, then the members of the committee
> can vote in the GIC Chair.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Feb 14, 2011, at 11:44 AM, Rex Booth wrote:
> >>
> >>> I think the latter structure is what's needed in order to maximize
> outreach potential.
> >>>
> >>> That said, I don't think that structure has an impact on how the chair
> is chosen.
> >>>
> >>> On 2/14/2011 11:32 AM, Eoin wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> There seems to be interest in the position which is great as I keep
> saying "Industry is where OWASP can gain traction".
> >>>>
> >>>> The individuals whom have expressed interest in the chair role are
> David Campbell (I may stand corrected here), Rex Booth and Joe Bernik.
> >>>>
> >>>> We have two options in terms of structure as I believe the committee
> once empowered by new OWASP bylaws may grow rather large.
> >>>> We discussed this in Portugal on Tuesday.....
> >>>>
> >>>> Option 1: Vote for a new chair, democratic and transparent.
> >>>>
> >>>> Option 2: Iinstall a chair with overarching responsibility of
> cross-committee and board communication but also form industry vertical
> committees represented by individuals from industry: Finance/Banking,
> Energy, Health, Gov, Transport? etc
> >>>> The vertical reps will need to actually be working in these industries
> but also understand the issues facing their own area of expertise.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thoughts?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Eoin Keary
> >>>> OWASP Global Board Member
> >>>> OWASP Code Review Guide Lead Author
> >>>>
> >>>> Sent from my i-Transmogrifier
> >>>> http://asg.ie/
> >>>> https://twitter.com/EoinKeary
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/global_industry_committee/attachments/20110214/fa39d0e2/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the Global_industry_committee mailing list