[Global_industry_committee] GIC Chair
colin.watson at owasp.org
Mon Feb 14 12:02:03 EST 2011
I think we need a single chair with sole responsibility for the
committee, whoever that might be.
But it is worth considering the effect of future committee growth
together with better engagement with particular sectors (verticals).
The term "GIC Special Representative" comes to mind... like an
ambassador. The draft Government/Education/Standards bodies codes of
conduct (circulated by Jeff to the summit list) mentions groups such
as the "OWASP Government Institution Executive Council" and "OWASP
Standards Body Executive Council". I don't know where they fit in,
but I suppose there could be similar groups for other verticals.
On 14 February 2011 16:32, Eoin <eoin.keary at owasp.org> wrote:
> There seems to be interest in the position which is great as I keep saying
> "Industry is where OWASP can gain traction".
> The individuals whom have expressed interest in the chair role are David
> Campbell (I may stand corrected here), Rex Booth and Joe Bernik.
> We have two options in terms of structure as I believe the committee once
> empowered by new OWASP bylaws may grow rather large.
> We discussed this in Portugal on Tuesday.....
> Option 1: Vote for a new chair, democratic and transparent.
> Option 2: Iinstall a chair with overarching responsibility of
> cross-committee and board communication but also form industry vertical
> committees represented by individuals from industry: Finance/Banking,
> Energy, Health, Gov, Transport? etc
> The vertical reps will need to actually be working in these industries but
> also understand the issues facing their own area of expertise.
> Eoin Keary
> OWASP Global Board Member
> OWASP Code Review Guide Lead Author
> Sent from my i-Transmogrifier
More information about the Global_industry_committee