[Global_industry_committee] GIC Chair

Rex Booth rex.booth at owasp.org
Mon Feb 14 11:44:42 EST 2011

I think the latter structure is what's needed in order to maximize 
outreach potential.

That said, I don't think that structure has an impact on how the chair 
is chosen.

On 2/14/2011 11:32 AM, Eoin wrote:
> Hi,
> There seems to be interest in the position which is great as I keep 
> saying "Industry is where OWASP can gain traction".
> The individuals whom have expressed interest in the chair role are 
> David Campbell (I may stand corrected here), Rex Booth and Joe Bernik.
> We have two options in terms of structure as I believe the committee 
> once empowered by new OWASP bylaws may grow rather large.
> We discussed this in Portugal on Tuesday.....
> *Option 1*: Vote for a new chair, democratic and transparent.
> *Option 2*: Iinstall a chair with overarching responsibility of 
> cross-committee and board communication but also form industry 
> vertical committees represented by individuals from industry: 
> Finance/Banking, Energy, Health, Gov, Transport? etc
> The vertical reps will need to actually be working in these industries 
> but also understand the issues facing their own area of expertise.
> Thoughts?
> Eoin Keary
> OWASP Global Board Member
> OWASP Code Review Guide Lead Author
> Sent from my i-Transmogrifier
> http://asg.ie/
> https://twitter.com/EoinKeary

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/global_industry_committee/attachments/20110214/1a438919/attachment.html 

More information about the Global_industry_committee mailing list