[Global_education_committee] Fwd: Input to Call for Training?

Seba seba at owasp.org
Fri Nov 27 05:26:47 EST 2009


hold your horses. We can set up the landing page for this.
But this should be on an opt-in basis, so we should ask the trainers
individually

Seba

On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Martin Knobloch
<martin.knobloch at owasp.org> wrote:
> Hi Seba, all,
> What you replied to John is what we agreed on during the Summit.
> Question is, who will put up the list? I could do it this weekend!
> Point to discus, how and where to keep (and share) the trainers scores!
> Cheers,
> ~Martin
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Seba <seba at owasp.org> wrote:
>>
>> comments?
>>
>> --Seba
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: seba <seba at owasp.org>
>> Date: 2009/11/26
>> Subject: Re: Input to Call for Training?
>> To: John Wilander <john.wilander at owasp.org>
>> Cc: dave wichers <dave.wichers at owasp.org>
>>
>>
>> John,
>>
>> How about:
>> As part of the OWASP Education projects, we start a list of OWASP
>> trainers on the OWASP web site.
>> This list (mentioning the trainer - course and contact details) will
>> cover all trainers that performed training at OWASP conferences,
>> together with their aggregated scores on the course feedback forms.
>> Of course, this is on opt-in base only. Please let us know if you are
>> interested to participate in this program?
>>
>> is this what you need?
>>
>> regards
>>
>> Seba
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:52 PM, John Wilander <john.wilander at owasp.org>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Dave and Seba!
>> >
>> > We have now announced that the Swedish chapter will meet and discuss the
>> > Top
>> > 10 2010 rc1 on December 2nd. Also, one of our members will poke the
>> > Singaporean chapter leader to do the same. We have the following on the
>> > agenda:
>> >
>> > 6 pm Presetation of OWASP Top 10 2010 rc1, focus on what's new
>> > 7 pm Discussion (joint feedback will be sent to OWASP centrally)
>> >  - Are the right threats and risks on the list? Is this what we see out
>> > there?
>> >  - Is the list in the right order according to us? Note that it's now
>> > risk-based.
>> >  - Is the list formulated in a way that suits pentesters, PCI audits
>> > etc?
>> > Will customers understand it?
>> >  - How do we reach out with the list? In short, how do we make this a
>> > better
>> > world?
>> >  - Should we translate it into Swedish? For instance two-and-two per
>> > list
>> > item, deadline in Januray.
>> >
>> > Now to the reason for my email:
>> >
>> > 1. Dave, is there something we need to think about before sending out
>> > the
>> > Call for Training for AppSec Research in Stockholm?
>> >
>> > 2. Seba, will you formulate two or three sentences about the upcoming
>> > rating
>> > of trainers? We need it in the Call for Training.
>> >
>> >    Regards, John
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Global_education_committee mailing list
>> Global_education_committee at lists.owasp.org
>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global_education_committee
>
>


More information about the Global_education_committee mailing list