[Global_chapter_committee] [Global_conference_committee] [Global_membership_committee] membership during registration

Lucas Ferreira lucas.ferreira at owasp.org
Wed May 18 14:08:13 EDT 2011


I think that the member should be able to choose a chapter or a
project to which the share will go to.

Improving projects is at least as important as improving chapters.

Lucas

On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 14:47, Mark Bristow <mark.bristow at owasp.org> wrote:
> Kate,
>
> I think I'm seeing a trend here that may answer your question :)
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Tin Zaw <tin.zaw at owasp.org> wrote:
>>
>> My personal opinion is to let the new/renewing member choose their
>> home chapter and have 40% of the membership dues go to that chapter.
>>
>> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Tom Brennan <tomb at owasp.org> wrote:
>> > Home chapter is home chapter separate from conference. We actually had a
>> > complaint last week from a member that became one at appsec dc and was
>> > not
>> > associated to the local chapter when we conducted a membership raffle.
>> >  So
>> > in order to measure chapters properly we need to track individuals to
>> > home
>> > chapters.  They should be able to transfer there association if they
>> > like as
>> > well (like they move change jobs etc...).  The membership hotline = the
>> > contact us form on the Owasp website top right
>> >
>> >
>> > On May 18, 2011, at 12:46 PM, "Stevens, Teresa" <ExSi at pge.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > I agree with following the standard membership policy. Thanks, --Teresa
>> >
>> > ________________________________
>> > From: global_chapter_committee-bounces at lists.owasp.org
>> > [mailto:global_chapter_committee-bounces at lists.owasp.org] On Behalf Of
>> > dan
>> > cornell
>> > Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 9:45 AM
>> > To: Mark Bristow
>> > Cc: global_chapter_committee at lists.owasp.org; dan cornell;
>> > Global_membership_committee at lists.owasp.org; kelly.santalucia at owasp.org;
>> > Kate Hartmann; global_conference_committee; Alison McNamee
>> > Subject: Re: [Global_chapter_committee] [Global_membership_committee]
>> > [Global_conference_committee] membership during registration
>> >
>> > I would tend to agree that we follow the standard membership policy of
>> > giving 40% to the originating chapter.  It is an incentive for the
>> > chapter
>> > folks to promote attendance at events.
>> > Thanks,
>> > Dan
>> >
>> > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Mark Bristow <mark.bristow at owasp.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> (looping in chapters and membership)
>> >> Kate,
>> >>
>> >> The Conferences Committee has no offical policy on this.  I was told
>> >> that
>> >> this went to the conference previously due to an undue burden on
>> >> accounting
>> >> resources.
>> >>
>> >> I'm of the opinion that it should follow the standard membership
>> >> committee
>> >> policy (as it's sort of separate activity from the conference). In
>> >> general
>> >> tho I don't really think this is our AoR but we can discuss if there
>> >> has
>> >> been a change in the operational requiremetns.
>> >>
>> >> -Mark
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> IMHO, this is a decision that should be left up to the conference
>> >>> planners.  If they are willing to take the time to separate the
>> >>> attendees
>> >>> into their respective chapters, then I think that due credit should be
>> >>> given
>> >>> to ensure that they get the 60/40 membership split.  If they are
>> >>> unwilling
>> >>> to take the time to do that, then it should just get rolled into the
>> >>> conference budget.  For what it's worth, "take the time" is basically
>> >>> just a
>> >>> matter of setting up a custom field in RegOnline before you start
>> >>> accepting
>> >>> registrations.  That field exists for LASCON 2011 and our intent is to
>> >>> pass
>> >>> the membership money back along to the chapter the member came from.
>> >>> This
>> >>> incentive helps encourage the other OWASP chapters in Texas to
>> >>> participate
>> >>> in LASCON.
>> >>>
>> >>> ~josh
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Kate Hartmann
>> >>> <kate.hartmann at owasp.org>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Group, this has come up in the past for discussion, but I’m not aware
>> >>>> that there was ever a final answer (other matters took priority)…
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> When an attendee becomes a member during the registration process for
>> >>>> an
>> >>>> event, does their 40% split apply to the event budget as income or to
>> >>>> the
>> >>>> local chapter a membership split.  Historically, this amount has
>> >>>> applied to
>> >>>> the conference budget, but I want to make sure we are continuing to
>> >>>> do what
>> >>>> we are supposed to be doing from an operational perspective.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> If the “policy” is to apply the split back to the local chapter, are
>> >>>> we
>> >>>> giving attendees the opportunity to choose their own local chapter
>> >>>> instead
>> >>>> of the host chapter?
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I need to make sure we get this set up correctly in all of our
>> >>>> events.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Kate Hartmann
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Operations Director
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 301-275-9403
>> >>>>
>> >>>> www.owasp.org
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Skype:  Kate.hartmann1
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> Global_conference_committee mailing list
>> >>>> Global_conference_committee at lists.owasp.org
>> >>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global_conference_committee
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> Global_conference_committee mailing list
>> >>> Global_conference_committee at lists.owasp.org
>> >>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global_conference_committee
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Mark Bristow
>> >> (703) 596-5175
>> >> mark.bristow at owasp.org
>> >>
>> >> OWASP Global Conferences Committee Chair - http://is.gd/5MTvF
>> >> OWASP DC Chapter Co-Chair - http://is.gd/5MTwu
>> >> AppSec DC Organizer - https://www.appsecdc.org
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Global_membership_committee mailing list
>> >> Global_membership_committee at lists.owasp.org
>> >> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global_membership_committee
>> >>
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Global_chapter_committee mailing list
>> > Global_chapter_committee at lists.owasp.org
>> > https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global_chapter_committee
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Global_chapter_committee mailing list
>> > Global_chapter_committee at lists.owasp.org
>> > https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global_chapter_committee
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Tin Zaw, CISSP, CSSLP
>> Chapter Leader and President, OWASP Los Angeles Chapter
>> Chair, OWASP Global Chapter Committee
>> Google Voice: (213) 973-9295
>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/tinzaw
>
>
>
> --
> Mark Bristow
> (703) 596-5175
> mark.bristow at owasp.org
>
> OWASP Global Conferences Committee Chair - http://is.gd/5MTvF
> OWASP DC Chapter Co-Chair - http://is.gd/5MTwu
> AppSec DC Organizer - https://www.appsecdc.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Global_conference_committee mailing list
> Global_conference_committee at lists.owasp.org
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global_conference_committee
>
>



-- 
Homo sapiens non urinat in ventum.


More information about the Global_chapter_committee mailing list