[Global_chapter_committee] [Global_membership_committee] [Global_conference_committee] membership during registration

Tin Zaw tin.zaw at owasp.org
Wed May 18 13:42:17 EDT 2011


My personal opinion is to let the new/renewing member choose their
home chapter and have 40% of the membership dues go to that chapter.

On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Tom Brennan <tomb at owasp.org> wrote:
> Home chapter is home chapter separate from conference. We actually had a
> complaint last week from a member that became one at appsec dc and was not
> associated to the local chapter when we conducted a membership raffle.  So
> in order to measure chapters properly we need to track individuals to home
> chapters.  They should be able to transfer there association if they like as
> well (like they move change jobs etc...).  The membership hotline = the
> contact us form on the Owasp website top right
>
>
> On May 18, 2011, at 12:46 PM, "Stevens, Teresa" <ExSi at pge.com> wrote:
>
> I agree with following the standard membership policy. Thanks, --Teresa
>
> ________________________________
> From: global_chapter_committee-bounces at lists.owasp.org
> [mailto:global_chapter_committee-bounces at lists.owasp.org] On Behalf Of dan
> cornell
> Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 9:45 AM
> To: Mark Bristow
> Cc: global_chapter_committee at lists.owasp.org; dan cornell;
> Global_membership_committee at lists.owasp.org; kelly.santalucia at owasp.org;
> Kate Hartmann; global_conference_committee; Alison McNamee
> Subject: Re: [Global_chapter_committee] [Global_membership_committee]
> [Global_conference_committee] membership during registration
>
> I would tend to agree that we follow the standard membership policy of
> giving 40% to the originating chapter.  It is an incentive for the chapter
> folks to promote attendance at events.
> Thanks,
> Dan
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Mark Bristow <mark.bristow at owasp.org>
> wrote:
>>
>> (looping in chapters and membership)
>> Kate,
>>
>> The Conferences Committee has no offical policy on this.  I was told that
>> this went to the conference previously due to an undue burden on accounting
>> resources.
>>
>> I'm of the opinion that it should follow the standard membership committee
>> policy (as it's sort of separate activity from the conference). In general
>> tho I don't really think this is our AoR but we can discuss if there has
>> been a change in the operational requiremetns.
>>
>> -Mark
>>
>> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> IMHO, this is a decision that should be left up to the conference
>>> planners.  If they are willing to take the time to separate the attendees
>>> into their respective chapters, then I think that due credit should be given
>>> to ensure that they get the 60/40 membership split.  If they are unwilling
>>> to take the time to do that, then it should just get rolled into the
>>> conference budget.  For what it's worth, "take the time" is basically just a
>>> matter of setting up a custom field in RegOnline before you start accepting
>>> registrations.  That field exists for LASCON 2011 and our intent is to pass
>>> the membership money back along to the chapter the member came from.  This
>>> incentive helps encourage the other OWASP chapters in Texas to participate
>>> in LASCON.
>>>
>>> ~josh
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Kate Hartmann <kate.hartmann at owasp.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Group, this has come up in the past for discussion, but I’m not aware
>>>> that there was ever a final answer (other matters took priority)…
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> When an attendee becomes a member during the registration process for an
>>>> event, does their 40% split apply to the event budget as income or to the
>>>> local chapter a membership split.  Historically, this amount has applied to
>>>> the conference budget, but I want to make sure we are continuing to do what
>>>> we are supposed to be doing from an operational perspective.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If the “policy” is to apply the split back to the local chapter, are we
>>>> giving attendees the opportunity to choose their own local chapter instead
>>>> of the host chapter?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I need to make sure we get this set up correctly in all of our events.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Kate Hartmann
>>>>
>>>> Operations Director
>>>>
>>>> 301-275-9403
>>>>
>>>> www.owasp.org
>>>>
>>>> Skype:  Kate.hartmann1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Global_conference_committee mailing list
>>>> Global_conference_committee at lists.owasp.org
>>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global_conference_committee
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Global_conference_committee mailing list
>>> Global_conference_committee at lists.owasp.org
>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global_conference_committee
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mark Bristow
>> (703) 596-5175
>> mark.bristow at owasp.org
>>
>> OWASP Global Conferences Committee Chair - http://is.gd/5MTvF
>> OWASP DC Chapter Co-Chair - http://is.gd/5MTwu
>> AppSec DC Organizer - https://www.appsecdc.org
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Global_membership_committee mailing list
>> Global_membership_committee at lists.owasp.org
>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global_membership_committee
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Global_chapter_committee mailing list
> Global_chapter_committee at lists.owasp.org
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global_chapter_committee
>
> _______________________________________________
> Global_chapter_committee mailing list
> Global_chapter_committee at lists.owasp.org
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global_chapter_committee
>
>



-- 
Tin Zaw, CISSP, CSSLP
Chapter Leader and President, OWASP Los Angeles Chapter
Chair, OWASP Global Chapter Committee
Google Voice: (213) 973-9295
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/tinzaw


More information about the Global_chapter_committee mailing list