[Global_chapter_committee] [Global_membership_committee] [Global_conference_committee] membership during registration

dan cornell dan.cornell at owasp.org
Wed May 18 12:44:43 EDT 2011


I would tend to agree that we follow the standard membership policy of
giving 40% to the originating chapter.  It is an incentive for the chapter
folks to promote attendance at events.

Thanks,

Dan


On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Mark Bristow <mark.bristow at owasp.org>wrote:

> (looping in chapters and membership)
> Kate,
>
> The Conferences Committee has no offical policy on this.  I was told that
> this went to the conference previously due to an undue burden on accounting
> resources.
>
> I'm of the opinion that it should follow the standard membership committee
> policy (as it's sort of separate activity from the conference). In general
> tho I don't really think this is our AoR but we can discuss if there has
> been a change in the operational requiremetns.
>
> -Mark
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
>
>> IMHO, this is a decision that should be left up to the conference
>> planners.  If they are willing to take the time to separate the attendees
>> into their respective chapters, then I think that due credit should be given
>> to ensure that they get the 60/40 membership split.  If they are unwilling
>> to take the time to do that, then it should just get rolled into the
>> conference budget.  For what it's worth, "take the time" is basically just a
>> matter of setting up a custom field in RegOnline before you start accepting
>> registrations.  That field exists for LASCON 2011 and our intent is to pass
>> the membership money back along to the chapter the member came from.  This
>> incentive helps encourage the other OWASP chapters in Texas to participate
>> in LASCON.
>>
>> ~josh
>>
>> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Kate Hartmann <kate.hartmann at owasp.org>wrote:
>>
>>>  Group, this has come up in the past for discussion, but I’m not aware
>>> that there was ever a final answer (other matters took priority)…
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> When an attendee becomes a member during the registration process for an
>>> event, does their 40% split apply to the event budget as income or to the
>>> local chapter a membership split.  Historically, this amount has applied to
>>> the conference budget, but I want to make sure we are continuing to do what
>>> we are supposed to be doing from an operational perspective.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If the “policy” is to apply the split back to the local chapter, are we
>>> giving attendees the opportunity to choose their own local chapter instead
>>> of the host chapter?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I need to make sure we get this set up correctly in all of our events.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Kate Hartmann
>>>
>>> Operations Director
>>>
>>> 301-275-9403
>>>
>>> www.owasp.org
>>>
>>> Skype:  Kate.hartmann1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Global_conference_committee mailing list
>>> Global_conference_committee at lists.owasp.org
>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global_conference_committee
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Global_conference_committee mailing list
>> Global_conference_committee at lists.owasp.org
>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global_conference_committee
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Mark Bristow
> (703) 596-5175
> mark.bristow at owasp.org
>
> OWASP Global Conferences Committee Chair - http://is.gd/5MTvF
> OWASP DC Chapter Co-Chair - http://is.gd/5MTwu
> AppSec DC Organizer - https://www.appsecdc.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Global_membership_committee mailing list
> Global_membership_committee at lists.owasp.org
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global_membership_committee
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/global_chapter_committee/attachments/20110518/b3845070/attachment.html 


More information about the Global_chapter_committee mailing list