[Global_chapter_committee] [Owasp-board] Electronic Vote
tin.zaw at owasp.org
Sun Apr 17 02:28:10 EDT 2011
Thank you for your work on the budget approval.
We submitted Global Chapter Committee budget with the following
1. We recognize not all budget asked for will be granted.
2. We put line items in the order of importance.
3. We recognize that the board may have different priorities or different
understanding of importance of each line item.
4. We err'ed on the side of over allocating.
5. For cross-committee item, student chapters, we coordinated with
membership and education committees to eliminate duplicates.
I will be happy to work with you on what is important, what is reasonable
and what can be compromised.
Please let me know if you want to follow up.
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Matt Tesauro <matt.tesauro at owasp.org>wrote:
> Eoin: I agree with staggering but technically speaking, that's not what
> we're voting on. We should communicate this to the committee chairs first.
> I sat in on the committee chair call earlier in the week and warned those
> on that call that OWASP is not flush with cash and we may need to scale back
> the committee budgets in the near term. However, we need to make sure
> committees understand this is not us hindering their work but the current
> fiscal realities.
> My votes:
> No on remaining budgets.
> More time is needed to understand fully the impact of the summit's
> expense on this years budget.
> No on the ByLaws.
> I'd like to have some time to review what Seba sent.
> I propose we re-vote these issues next Friday (April 22) to give us the
> time to look into them - especially the budget issue.
> I also have a proposal I'll be crafting on how to allocate OWASP funds
> going forward with respect to the global committees and overarching expenses
> (those that touch multiple committees). However, I need some more time with
> the numbers I got from Alison before I can make a specific proposal.
> -- Matt Tesauro
> OWASP Board Member
> OWASP WTE Project Lead
> http://AppSecLive.org - Community and Download site
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 4:46 AM, Eoin <eoin.keary at owasp.org> wrote:
>> Yes, bit let's stagger committee funding or provide when required.
>> Sent from my HTC hero.
>> owasp board member
>> On 15 Apr 2011 13:48, "seba seba" <seba at owasp.org> wrote:
>> 1. Yes, but under the condition that these are part of an overall 2011
>> 2. No - I have some questions & remarks on the Bylaws attached. There are
>> references that are not clear, roles that are not defined and committee's of
>> which no governance is defined. Furthermore I'd like to add a paragraph that
>> clarifies the International role which provides a legal umbrella for legal
>> entities in other countries or regions that fall under it.
>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Kate Hartmann <kate.hartmann at owasp.org>
>> > As per the board...
> Owasp-board mailing list
> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
Tin Zaw, CISSP, CSSLP
Chapter Leader and President, OWASP Los Angeles Chapter<http://www.owaspla.org/>
Chair, OWASP Global Chapter
Google Voice: (213) 973-9295
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Global_chapter_committee