[GPC] OWASP Speakers, Trainings, Boot Camp material from the projects
Matt Tesauro
mtesauro at gmail.com
Fri May 29 09:52:59 EDT 2009
Martin,
Feel free to update that page. I may have originally authored it
but its on a Wiki after all. I'm pretty much of the opinion, if you
have the time, you have the authority. ; )
I also agree with your thoughts on boot camp vs training material. That
is an excellent point.
-- Matt Tesauro
OWASP Live CD Project Lead
http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Category:OWASP_Live_CD_Project
http://AppSecLive.org - Community and Download Site
Martin Knobloch wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> Do you want me to update the Project_Wiki_Page_Minimal_Content page?
>
> I think indeed, the boot camp slides should be part of the minimal. That
> as it should only contain the partitioner's, targets and result.
> The training indeed is a more detailed result after some work is done.
> You need to have something developed in order to train anyone about it :-)
>
> Both thanks for the quick response!
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
>
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Matt Tesauro <mtesauro at gmail.com
> <mailto:mtesauro at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Paulo: Your reply was quicker then mine but we had the same thoughts.
>
> Martin: If you look at the link that Paulo sent, you'll see a concrete
> example of your first point. For you second, I was thinking that
> perhaps it can be part of the Project Health Rating metrics. (see the
> section above the link)
>
> Having a training/tutorial would seem like a very good metric to use for
> the projects with the highest health rating. Assuming that we more
> prominently display level 3 projects, hopefully the allure of more
> prominent placement is sufficient incentive to create the
> tutorials/training your committee is looking for.
>
> One other perhaps subtle part of the health levels is the idea that the
> Wiki minimum content is checked whenever a level changes. Hopefully
> this will provide a mechanism to check that any material about the
> project (like the slide deck) is up to date. Certainly this should hold
> true for those projects that are moving up the levels.
>
> HTH.
>
> -- Matt Tesauro
> OWASP Live CD Project Lead
> http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Category:OWASP_Live_CD_Project
> http://AppSecLive.org - Community and Download site
>
> Paulo Coimbra wrote:
> > Martin,
> >
> >
> >
> > As you know we are currently reviewing our assessment criteria.
> In its
> > draft version, as “/Project Health”/ criterion*, *we have*
> *established
> > the condition of having a “conference style presentation that
> describes
> > the tool in at least 3 slides” -
> >
> http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Assessing_Project_Health#Project_Wiki_Page_Minimal_Content.
> > Is that ok? If not, please free to edit directly the wiki.
> >
> >
> >
> > WRT your second question, I believe the best and only list of
> assessed
> > projects we have is the SoC 2008’s one – here
> > http://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Summer_of_Code_2008 and here
> > http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dcn8962c_41hjg48kd4.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
> >
> > Paulo Coimbra,
> >
> > OWASP Project Manager <https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Main_Page>
> >
> >
> >
> > *From:* global-projects-committee-bounces at lists.owasp.org
> <mailto:global-projects-committee-bounces at lists.owasp.org>
> > [mailto:global-projects-committee-bounces at lists.owasp.org
> <mailto:global-projects-committee-bounces at lists.owasp.org>] *On
> Behalf Of
> > *Martin Knobloch
> > *Sent:* terça-feira, 19 de Maio de 2009 12:16
> > *To:* global-projects-committee at lists.owasp.org
> <mailto:global-projects-committee at lists.owasp.org>
> > *Subject:* [GPC] OWASP Speakers, Trainings, Boot Camp material
> from the
> > projects
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Global Project Committee,
> >
> >
> >
> > One of the targets of the Global Education Committee is to create
> a Boot
> > Camp project, as agreed on during the Summit '08.
> >
> > The meaning is a deck of max 5 slides from each project, about
> the project.
> >
> > Also, we are looking for trainings about the projects. Instead of
> trying
> > to set up a training for each, we will supply templates and hopefully
> > will get the trainings from the projects.
> >
> >
> >
> > Both could be a criteria for a project to get a higher level! ;-)
> >
> > ..if I am not mistaken, the boot camp material should be brought
> forward
> > by the Foundation Board as Beta status requirement.
> >
> >
> >
> > Therefore, I am looking for a list of project leaders and hope
> you can
> > supply a list of projects, the project leaders, even better listed by
> > the project state.
> >
> >
> >
> > Can you help me out?
> >
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > ~Martin
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Global-projects-committee mailing list
> > Global-projects-committee at lists.owasp.org
> <mailto:Global-projects-committee at lists.owasp.org>
> > https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global-projects-committee
>
>
More information about the Global-projects-committee
mailing list