sastry_ka at yahoo.com
Wed Jun 28 11:00:06 EDT 2006
Please unsubscribe me from the list.
--- Rogan Dawes <lists at dawes.za.net> wrote:
> xxradar wrote:
> > Hi Rogan,
> > Seems to be something wrong at a given point that
> the selected query does
> > not match the decoded one ... both attached gifs
> are showing the problem in
> > a different manner.
> > The dropdown to intercepts certain types might be
> useful (example only
> > trigger posts, seems very interesting to me). It
> is certainly intuitive and
> > makes things less complex at first sight. Btw,
> the new look and feel of WS
> > is very nice, although I should mention, once you
> get the habits, the other
> > version is certainly workable too.
> > Some ideas:
> > - Is there an easy way tot clean the db? (or did I
> miss it).
> > - Another thing that might seem interesting to me
> (but maybe I do not look
> > carefully enough :-) in WS ... a way to filter
> requests belonging to one
> > site in the conversation window. (Typically there
> is stuff mangling like RSS
> > feeds, Google desktop ...)
> > - Insert the IP source address in the conversation
> view (I like the fact
> > that multiple machines connect through WS)
> > gr
> Hi Philippe,
> Yes, I have also seen that corruption. I think that
> there may be a
> synchronization problem, or something like that.
> Fortunately, the problem goes away if you exit and
> restart, so it is not
> a data corruption, more like a view corruption, I
> Yes, there is a very easy way to clean the DB
> DEL C:\temp\webscarab.backup
> DEL C:\temp\webscarab.data
> DEL C:\temp\webscarab.properties
> DEL C:\temp\webscarab.script
> As far as filtering goes, I plan to have a mechanism
> for filtering the
> conversation view on the various columns, as well as
> an advanced option
> similar to the Search plugin in the existing
> With regards to the source IP Address, it is not
> something that is
> currently stored. We COULD add it to the
> ConversationSummary, although
> it would actually be a Proxy-specific field. i.e.
> only the proxy would
> be able to have conversations that were not
> generated locally.
> I must confess, I don't think I have ever had more
> than one machine
> connecting through WebScarab at any one time . . . .
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support
> web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated
> technology to make your job easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1
> based on Apache Geronimo
> Owasp-webscarab mailing list
> Owasp-webscarab at lists.sourceforge.net
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
More information about the Owasp-webscarab