[Owasp-Summit-2011] Owasp-summit-2011 Digest, Vol 6, Issue 20

Zaid Shopeju youthvisionalliancenetwork at gmail.com
Mon Dec 13 02:57:20 EST 2010 

Please can anyone assist me with the registration for the conference? I wish
to participate at the conference but I dont know how to go about the
registration process and funding application.

I will appreciate it if anyone could kindly put me through.

Thank you for time and anticipated assistance.

Sincerely,

Zaid Shopeju

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 1:34 AM,
<owasp-summit-2011-request at lists.owasp.org>wrote:

> Send Owasp-summit-2011 mailing list submissions to
>        owasp-summit-2011 at lists.owasp.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-summit-2011
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        owasp-summit-2011-request at lists.owasp.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        owasp-summit-2011-owner at lists.owasp.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Owasp-summit-2011 digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: Mapping the next batch of Summit Attendees (John Wilander)
>   2. Question - Veracode sponsorship (Justin Clarke)
>   3. Re: Trustwave Sponsorship Summit (Justin Clarke)
>   4. Re: [Global_conference_committee] Question -      Veracode
>      sponsorship (Mark Bristow)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 22:56:31 +0100
> From: John Wilander <john.wilander at owasp.org>
> Subject: Re: [Owasp-Summit-2011] Mapping the next batch of Summit
>        Attendees
> To: dinis cruz <dinis.cruz at owasp.org>
> Cc: owasp-summit-2011 at lists.owasp.org
> Message-ID:
>        <AANLkTi=S8Loe4UmVzrrnp8xz9XR3Jtgd+bYWdccyN_eo at mail.gmail.com<S8Loe4UmVzrrnp8xz9XR3Jtgd%2BbYWdccyN_eo at mail.gmail.com>
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hey!
>
> I checked the spreadsheet and read the email below. For me this is not very
> controversial. Of course we need to be considerate when we judge our
> contributors/peers but the job has to be done and there's logic to the
> figures presented. With this kind of list we'll be transparent enough to
> withstand hard feelings and such.
>
> OWASP is not too hierarchical, so this is pretty close to peer-assessment.
> In the future we could even publish the points system in advance.
>
>   /John
>
> 2010/12/12 dinis cruz <dinis.cruz at owasp.org>
>
> > Summit team (& Board)
> >
> > Following the conversations we had last week, here is a proposed model
> for
> > how to identify the receipients of the current 50k,  and the other Summit
> > participants that also need funding.
> >
> > Please note that this is just a first pass at figuring out this model,
> and
> > we really need to have this completed (and in format that makes sense)
> > before we open up the discussion to the rest of the OWASP Leaders (and
> > crowd-source this effort to them)
> >
> > Please take a close look at the tables in: *
> >
> https://spreadsheets.google.com/a/owasp.org/ccc?key=0Amvv_7Gz8Z7TdGNEb0RRUUdfX0tMQ1EwTjY1MzNMWmc&hl=en
> > *
> >
> > Hopefully it will make very clear why this is a complex issue and one
> that
> > we need to tackle with sensitivity
> >
> > I used Jason's spreadsheet to map the Global Committee members and made a
> > number of changes to it :)
> >
> > First please take a look at the *Global Committee Members *spreadsheet
> >
> > This contains the lastest information received from the Committees. The
> > logic that we are using on this table is:
> >
> >    -
> >    - A = Active Committee Members -> to be sponsored on the 1st round
> (the
> >    50k we already have)
> >    - N = New Committee Members -> to be given 2 points in the 2nd Batch
> of
> >    Sponsorships
> >    - R = Reconfirmed Committee Members -> to be given 1 points in the 2nd
> >    Batch of Sponsorships
> >
> > As you will see on the next spreadsheet, the N and R ones will have to
> > compete with the list that we are creating with the Chapter Leaders,
> Project
> > Leaders, Conference Organizers, historic OWASPers and key industry
> players
> > that can make it to the Summit (the logic to give 2 points to the new
> > Committee members is that we should give then the benefit of the doubt
> and
> > the fact that they are currently full of energy).
> >
> > Remember that we will not be able to please everybody here since there
> are
> > always gaps between people's perceived contribution/value and what they
> > actually really did.
> >
> > The next Spreadsheet to look at is the *2nd Batch - Sponsorships*
> > *
> > *
> > This table contains a consolidation of everybody we are currently aware
> > that could go to the Summit and could deserve funding (it basically has
> all
> > Ns and Rs (New and Reconfirmed) from the previous table and the people
> from
> > this table (that is not already covered by the 50k):  *
> > http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Summit_2011_Attendee*
> > *
> > *
> > I took a first stab at creating a criteria for how to create the list of
> > 'who gets sponsored first' (and for how much).
> >
> > Here is the list that me and Sarah came up with in the first session
> spent
> > around that table (which ultimately is defining what 'creates values' at
> > OWASP and how much weight does it have):
> >
> >    - Recommit Committee member 1 point
> >    - New Committee Member 2 points
> >    - Active Project Leader (New Project) 1 point OWASP Project created in
> >    the last 6 months
> >    - Active Project Leader (Major project) 2 point OWASP Project that has
> >    more than 6 month and has at least a Alpha release
> >    - Responded by 30th 2 point Can follow directions
> >    - Participated at AppSec 1 point
> >    - AppSec organizer in 2009/2010 2 points It takes a lot of work to
> >    organizing an OWASP AppSec
> >    - Active Chapter leaders 1 points Chapter had at least 3 meetings in
> >    last 6 months
> >    - Key Industry player 2 point
> >    - OWASP Historic leaders 2 point
> >    - Special Invitation 4 points Individual who is critical for a
> >    particular Working session (and would bring more attendees)
> >
> > Note that we are already at a 100K in 'sponsorship needed' value, I will
> > predict that the total amount of money needed will be about 150k
> (although
> > not all in that list will need the full 2000 USD, we should expect that
> > number of people to grow significantly).
> >
> > The discusion about how to raise this 100k to 150k is a special
> discussion,
> > so please use this thread to talk about the selection criteria and how to
> > create the list of 'Who gets sponsored first'
> >
> > Dinis Cruz
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Owasp-summit-2011 mailing list
> > Owasp-summit-2011 at lists.owasp.org
> > https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-summit-2011
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> John Wilander, https://twitter.com/johnwilander
> Chapter co-leader OWASP Sweden, http://owaspsweden.blogspot.com
> <http://owaspsweden.blogspot.com>Co-organizer Global Summit,
> http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Summit_2011
> <http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Summit_2011>Conf Comm,
> http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Global_Conferences_Committee
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> https://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-summit-2011/attachments/20101212/803c3119/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 22:56:53 +0000
> From: Justin Clarke <justin.clarke at owasp.org>
> Subject: [Owasp-Summit-2011] Question - Veracode sponsorship
> To: global_conference_committee at lists.owasp.org
> Cc: owasp-summit-2011 at lists.owasp.org
> Message-ID: <70526AB2-3F46-49D1-96BB-54CA1308D465 at owasp.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Hi All,
>
> As part of the discussions around Summit sponsorship, the marketing guys
> from Veracode mentioned that it would be good to talk about more centralised
> sponsorship for OWASP.  Currently I believe they sponsor some of the global
> and/or regional conferences, and it would be easier for them if this was
> done centrally and for one bigger budget item.
>
> Is this something for the Conferences committee? Or would somebody else be
> an appropriate party to hand this off to?
>
> Cheers
>
> Justin Clarke
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 00:04:27 +0000
> From: Justin Clarke <justin.clarke at owasp.org>
> Subject: Re: [Owasp-Summit-2011] Trustwave Sponsorship Summit
> To: Thomas Brennan <TBrennan at trustwave.com>
> Cc: "owasp-summit-2011 at lists.owasp.org"
>        <owasp-summit-2011 at lists.owasp.org>
> Message-ID: <CA2576FB-A603-44BB-8A10-FC2C392E98D2 at owasp.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> Just forwarded you the invite. And believe me, as the guy who charges the
> $5k a year for GDS onto his card, I know ;-) ... which reminds me - need to
> follow up with Alison about the fact our logo hasn't made it back onto that
> page yet...
>
> Justin
>
> On 12 Dec 2010, at 23:55, Thomas Brennan wrote:
>
> > will try to join - please send details.
> >
> > **Note the summit already has Silver Sponsors they are =
> http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Membership#Current_OWASP_Organization_Supporters_.26_Individual_Members
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Dec 12, 2010, at 9:14 AM, Justin Clarke wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Tom,
> >>
> >> I've updated the Sponsorship page to document what we've decided to date
> within the committee. So far, all sponsorship decisions have been around
> sponsoring attendees and the opportunities around that. We haven't
> enumerated other sponsor opportunities (such as discussed), and due to the
> way that the venue has been negotiated its not possible to split out some of
> the exact packages, so we'll end up with some fairly arbitrary numbers for
> these packages, like the $5k noted.
> >>
> >> On a side note, if you've got a $2.5k budget, a better use might be to
> sponsor your attendance as a board member (with associated logo/promotion)
> and find something for the other $500.  If you'd care to join us on the
> Tuesday call we can discuss?
> >>
> >> Some notes on other possible non-attendee related packages:
> >> - sponsor pads/pencils (Tom's suggestion for Trustwave to sponsor)
> >> - sponsor coffee breaks/refreshments (Veracode suggestion)
> >> - sponsor social event
> >>
> >> Best regards
> >>
> >> Justin
> >>
> >> On 12 Dec 2010, at 03:36, Lorna Alamri wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Tom,
> >>> The Summit Planning Committee meets Tuesday night. I should have an
> answer for you after the meeting if not sooner.
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Lorna
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Thomas Brennan <
> TBrennan at trustwave.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> $5000 for an existing corporate annual supporter? What is the cost for
> a non-corporate supporter?
> >>>
> >>> I only have $2500 let me know what books, pens etc we can sponsor for
> the 80 people attending as requested.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Semper Fi,
> >>>
> >>> Tom Brennan | Director, Spiderlabs
> >>> TRUSTWAVE
> >>> Direct: 973-202-0122
> >>> eMail: tbrennan at trustwave.com
> >>> Url: http://www.spiderlabs.com
> >>>
> >>> ________________________________
> >>> From: Lorna Alamri <lorna.alamri at owasp.org>
> >>> Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 20:29:43 -0600
> >>> To: Thomas Brennan<TBrennan at trustwave.com>
> >>> Cc: Kate Hartmann<kate.hartmann at owasp.org>; Justin Clarke<
> justin.clarke at owasp.org>; owasp-summit-2011 at lists.owasp.org<
> owasp-summit-2011 at lists.owasp.org>
> >>> Subject: Re: Trustwave Sponsorship Summit
> >>>
> >>> Tom,
> >>> Congrats on your new position. I had a chance to connect with Justin
> and he is working on getting an update to the Sponsoring page up on the
> wiki, but let me know the cost is $5,000. We'd love to get the Trustwave
> logo up on the Summit pages.
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Lorna
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Thomas Brennan <
> TBrennan at trustwave.com<mailto:TBrennan at trustwave.com>> wrote:
> >>> Lorna, we want to supply the summit with working materials, notebook,
> lanyards, pens and other misc materials.  Please provide us a cost and we
> will sponsor.
> >>>
> >>> Brennan
> >>>
> >>> Tom Brennan
> >>> Direct: 973-202-0122
> >>> Skype: proactiverisk
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Lorna Alamri
> >>>
> >>> OWASP MSP: Host to OWASP AppSec USA 2011
> >>> September 20-23 Training, Talks, CTF, and Vendor Show
> >>> www.appsecusa.org<http://www.appsecusa.org/> (2011 site coming soon)
> >>> @appsecusa, @owaspmsp
> >>> Dir: 651-338-0243
> >>> skype: lorna.alamri
> >>> lorna.alamri at owasp.org<mailto:lorna.alamri at owasp.org>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Lorna Alamri
> >>> OWASP Minneapolis-St. Paul Chapter Vice President
> >>> OWASP MSP: Host to OWASP AppSec USA 2011
> >>> September 20-23 Training, Talks, CTF, and Vendor Show
> >>> www.appsecusa.org (2011 site coming soon)
> >>> @appsecusa, @owaspmsp
> >>> Dir: 651-338-0243
> >>> skype: lorna.alamri
> >>> lorna.alamri at owasp.org
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 19:35:32 -0500
> From: Mark Bristow <mark.bristow at owasp.org>
> Subject: Re: [Owasp-Summit-2011] [Global_conference_committee]
>        Question -      Veracode sponsorship
> To: Justin Clarke <justin.clarke at owasp.org>
> Cc: global_conference_committee at lists.owasp.org,
>        owasp-summit-2011 at lists.owasp.org
> Message-ID:
>        <AANLkTikSQZf8xQ9HHnN=PEmK109DQ5dNmXkD+HWbaKuF at mail.gmail.com<PEmK109DQ5dNmXkD%2BHWbaKuF at mail.gmail.com>
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> If adopted, this is a priority for the GCC 2011 plan
>
>
> https://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/global_conference_committee/2010-December/000559.html
>
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Justin Clarke <justin.clarke at owasp.org
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > As part of the discussions around Summit sponsorship, the marketing guys
> > from Veracode mentioned that it would be good to talk about more
> centralised
> > sponsorship for OWASP.  Currently I believe they sponsor some of the
> global
> > and/or regional conferences, and it would be easier for them if this was
> > done centrally and for one bigger budget item.
> >
> > Is this something for the Conferences committee? Or would somebody else
> be
> > an appropriate party to hand this off to?
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Justin Clarke
> > _______________________________________________
> > Global_conference_committee mailing list
> > Global_conference_committee at lists.owasp.org
> > https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global_conference_committee
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Mark Bristow
> (703) 596-5175
> mark.bristow at owasp.org
>
> OWASP Global Conferences Committee Chair - http://is.gd/5MTvF
> OWASP DC Chapter Co-Chair - http://is.gd/5MTwu
> AppSec DC Organizer - https://www.appsecdc.org
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> https://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-summit-2011/attachments/20101212/94d355d6/attachment.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Owasp-summit-2011 mailing list
> Owasp-summit-2011 at lists.owasp.org
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-summit-2011
>
>
> End of Owasp-summit-2011 Digest, Vol 6, Issue 20
> ************************************************
>



-- 
Zaid Shopeju

Executive Director | Youth Vision Alliance Network (YVAN)
Political Scientist | Sustainable Development Strategist | Youth Advocate
---
Email: zaid.shopeju at youthvan.org
Alt. email: zaid.shopeju at yahoo.com
Skype: larex2010
Twitter: @zaidshopeju
Cell: +2348055168828, +2348139427868

www.youthvan.org
http://www.uicc.org/programmes/youth-vision-alliance-network-yvan
http://ecyg.wikispaces.com/Nigeria_Youth+Vision+Alliance

“I swore never to be silent whenever and wherever human beings endure
suffering and humiliation. We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the
oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the
tormented.”

               -Elie Wiesel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-summit-2011/attachments/20101213/fdf301f4/attachment-0001.html

More information about the Owasp-summit-2011 mailing list