[Owasp-orizon] On formalism used for describing a rule...

[Stephen Craig Evans]

Hi Paolo,

Because of my inexperience with static analysis rules engines could
you explain further and/or give an example?

I have 2 of your prezos,
The_Owasp_Orizon_Project_Towards_version_1.0_v1.0.ppt
The_Owasp_Orizon_Project_Internals_v2_2_Paolo.ppt

if it helps to refer to any of those slides.

Thanks in advance,
Stephen


On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Paolo Perego <thesp0nge at owasp.org> wrote:
> Hi guys, yesterday evening I was wondering about freecc and parser
> generator stuff we used in Mirage... it is great.
> So I thought, why don't we use the same approach for rule engine? I
> mean, we can use, instead of a sort of XML, a proper "Orizon language"
> to describe rule and let freecc generate the parser for it.
>
> What do you think? Does it make sense?
>
> Ciao ciao
> Paolo
> --
> "stay hungry, stay foolish"
>
> OWASP Orizon project, http://orizon.sourceforge.net
> "enjoy your code review experience"
> _______________________________________________
> Owasp-orizon mailing list
> Owasp-orizon at lists.owasp.org
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-orizon
>



-- 
http://www.linkedin.com/in/stephencraigevans