[Owasp-mobile-security-project] Feedback re top 10 mobile controls and design principles
bensonk42 at gmail.com
Wed May 25 10:02:04 EDT 2011
I'd like to suggest that the pointer be a member of this list, to emphasize
its importance to the developers we hope will take time to read it.
On May 25, 2011 9:58 AM, "Kenneth Van Wyk" <ken at krvw.com> wrote:
> On May 25, 2011, at 9:11 AM, Jim Manico wrote:
>> The most interesting and important mobile apps leverage web services that
require all the goodness of standard web app secure development.
> I completely agree.
>> I feel this is worthy of a top ten item to make this list complete for
> I feel a reference to it is worthy of the mobile list. I just don't see
value in repeating the server list on the mobile list (or vice versa).
> Without a doubt, the devs need some security control guidance. We agree on
> What we disagree on is simply how to best do that.
> Repeating a server side list here would result in an unnecessary
bifurcation that is likely to (in time) be flawed--just as a server list
that tries to address mobile-side issues would be.
> Pointers can be a good thing (when they don't result in memory
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Owasp-mobile-security-project