[Owasp-leaders] Part 1: Where should OWASP invest the 90, 000 USD funds available for the next season of code?
Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman
buanzo at buanzo.com.ar
Fri May 8 10:03:25 EDT 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I don't want the money to be used that way, either. But, the tools that are already Beta, could have
even better docs, or ports to other OSes, etc. Or more conferences about them be organized, etc, etc.
Project Leaders that did not fulfill their goals... well, they're probably not easily accepted in a
new Season of Code/Quality.
Stephen Craig Evans wrote:
> Sorry to speak a little harshly, but the people in charge of the
> projects should have finished their goals and put them in their
> appropriate Beta or Released stages.
> Are you suggesting a bailout for projects that did not meet their commitments?
> I think that the Global Projects committee has done a wonderful job
> to-date in setting the parameters for self-imposed policing of each
> person's project. That is their mandate.
> If somebody has a Beta or Alpha project that wants upgrading, they
> should have to compete with everybody else that has new projects and
> new, cool ideas.
> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Sherif Koussa <sherif.fathy at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I would suggest to put all the money towards finishing up existing projects
>> whether at Beta or Alpha stages. I'd rather see 15 GA projects rather than
>> 100 or 200 Betas and Alphas.
>> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 5:14 AM, dinis cruz <dinis.cruz at owasp.org> wrote:
>>> Ok, we are about to launch the OWASP Season of Code 2009 grant sponsorship
>>> program (next week in Crakow (OWASP EU AppSec)), but, before we spam you
>>> with all its details (and a number of ideas for
>>> projects/research/activities), I would like to just ask you a must simpler
>>> "Where should OWASP invest the 90,000 USD funds available for the next
>>> season of code?"
>>> Please take into account that given the current financial outlook, we
>>> might NOT be able to do another Season or Code next year (2010) unless we
>>> have a substantial increase in Corporate Memberships (or find additional
>>> sponsorship funding sources). Note that currently, we really don't have the
>>> budget for the 2010 Summit.
>>> OWASP-Leaders mailing list
>>> OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org
>> OWASP-Leaders mailing list
>> OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org
Arturo "Buanzo" Busleiman / Arturo Busleiman @ 4:900/107
Independent Linux and Security Consultant - SANS - OISSG - OWASP
Mailing List Archives at http://archiver.mailfighter.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the OWASP-Leaders