[OWASP-GUIDE] do we want CVS notifcation?
mark at curphey.com
Mon Jan 13 22:11:45 EST 2003
4 sounds perfect to me.
BTW (and I am as guilty as everyone) but we all seem to have missed the
12th milestone date. Given the past history we need to keep an eye on
it, many people just drop of the face of the earth for no apparent
Can everyone send a quick update of where they are ?
On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 18:36, Alex Russell wrote:
> On Monday 13 January 2003 18:07, Mark Curphey wrote:
> > I think its been grest for Filters. My vote is for yes.
> At this point, I've gotten both votes for and against. This leaves us with a
> couple of options:
> 1.) ignore the votes "for", and only I will receive notices
> 2.) ignore the votes "against" and pipe the notices to this list
> 3.) setup another SF mailing list to receive notices. This has the drawback
> of creating a list which we can never delete.
> 4.) setup a ficticious user on SF, pipe notices to that user, and redirect
> that user's email to an outside list that I host, which can be deleted.
> This would be necessaray as SF doesn't allow mail comming from one of their
> shell servers to leave their domain (which makes lots of sense).
> Alex Russell
> alex at netWindows.org
> alex at SecurePipe.com
> This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte
> are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE
> Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues.
> Owasp-guide mailing list
> Owasp-guide at lists.sourceforge.net
More information about the Owasp-guide