noloader at gmail.com
Fri Aug 12 12:04:42 EDT 2011
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:15 AM, David Anderson
<david.anderson at aspectsecurity.com> wrote:
> I'd like to take that on.
My bad - when I looked at Boost::logger, it was for programming
deficiencies. Please carry on (I'm not making any recommendations).
> On Aug 12, 2011, at 11:02 AM, "Kevin W. Wall" <kevin.w.wall at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Regarding logger...
>> IIRC, log4cpp was the original choice, but *if* Boost::Logging works, I'm OK w/
>> that too.
>> If someone on this list could look at them both and make a recommendation,
>> that would be much appreciated. I'm not going to have very much time
>> to contribute
>> until after next Thurs (i.e., a large block of hrs), otherwise I'd take a peek.
>> Blog: http://off-the-wall-security.blogspot.com/
>> "The most likely way for the world to be destroyed, most experts agree,
>> is by accident. That's where we come in; we're computer professionals.
>> We *cause* accidents." -- Nathaniel Borenstein
>> Owasp-esapi-c++ mailing list
>> Owasp-esapi-c++ at lists.owasp.org
More information about the Owasp-esapi-c++