[Owasp-esapi-c++] Two Self Tests Now Available

[Jeffrey Walton]

On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Jeffrey Walton <noloader at gmail.com> wrote:
>> It would be nice if we could make use of the auto registering feature.
> No problem. Remember, I was just kicking tires on it (and not
> discarding work). Please feel free to change anything you desire.
>
> On the good side, I ordered a couple books on Boost (overnight, should
> be here later today). So I won't be such a lame tool when it comes to
> the library; and might actually be an asset for you.
Well, it looks like I set my expectations too high. The two Boost
books were disappointing - each had a paragraph on Boost Test.

Am I the only guy who finds it suspicious that a C++ test library is
full of macros; and lacking functions, functors, predicates, etc?

Jeff

> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Daniel Amodio
> <dan.amodio at aspectsecurity.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'm fine with either arch.
>> It would be nice if we could make use of the auto registering feature.
>>
>>
>> ----- Reply message -----
>> From: "Jeffrey Walton" <noloader at gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, Aug 3, 2011 1:40 pm
>> Subject: [Owasp-esapi-c++] Two Self Tests Now Available
>> To: "ESAPI C++ List" <owasp-esapi-c++ at lists.owasp.org>
>>
>> Hi All/Daniel,
>>
>> I checked in test/codecs/PushbackStringTest.cpp (and added it to make
>> srcs). It does nothing at this point. I was using it to try the waters
>> with boost::test.
>>
>> I've got to jump out and perform some tests on SafeInt (David sent
>> over another internal test version). As soon as SafeInt gets stable
>> under OWASP testing, I will add it to the project with test files.
>>
>> I should be able to get back to boost::test later today (if Daniel
>> does not get to it first). I suspect we might need a 1 'master test'
>> which provides main() and performs boost_test_init(). Daniel suggested
>> discrete masters based on functional groups, which is also a good
>> idea.