[Owasp-esapi-c++] Two Self Tests Now Available

[Jeffrey Walton]

> It would be nice if we could make use of the auto registering feature.
No problem. Remember, I was just kicking tires on it (and not
discarding work). Please feel free to change anything you desire.

On the good side, I ordered a couple books on Boost (overnight, should
be here later today). So I won't be such a lame tool when it comes to
the library; and might actually be an asset for you.

Jeff

On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Daniel Amodio
<dan.amodio at aspectsecurity.com> wrote:
>
> I'm fine with either arch.
> It would be nice if we could make use of the auto registering feature.
>
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone
>
>
>
> ----- Reply message -----
> From: "Jeffrey Walton" <noloader at gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, Aug 3, 2011 1:40 pm
> Subject: [Owasp-esapi-c++] Two Self Tests Now Available
> To: "ESAPI C++ List" <owasp-esapi-c++ at lists.owasp.org>
>
> Hi All/Daniel,
>
> I checked in test/codecs/PushbackStringTest.cpp (and added it to make
> srcs). It does nothing at this point. I was using it to try the waters
> with boost::test.
>
> I've got to jump out and perform some tests on SafeInt (David sent
> over another internal test version). As soon as SafeInt gets stable
> under OWASP testing, I will add it to the project with test files.
>
> I should be able to get back to boost::test later today (if Daniel
> does not get to it first). I suspect we might need a 1 'master test'
> which provides main() and performs boost_test_init(). Daniel suggested
> discrete masters based on functional groups, which is also a good
> idea.
>