[Owasp-board] Items for DC board meeting
eoin.keary at owasp.org
Thu Nov 4 15:14:53 UTC 2010
I believe we can learn something from Richard, he comes from great pedigree
(Ernst & Young). :0)
I think it makes strategic sense to discuss options with him and to gain
some of his insight.
We need to agree what we actually want in order to communicate our
objectives to Richard effectively. I believe we need to do this before
Richard talks to us (this may be the derailment jeff was talking about)
otherwise he may not understand context and limitations of our options,
On 4 November 2010 14:43, Matt Tesauro <matt.tesauro at owasp.org> wrote:
> 1) Rackspace offers both supported and unsupported hosts - the specific
> breakdown of what they are offering are the very details to be worked
> out. They also have a hybrid model where we can mix and match fully
> supported and unsupported hosts. My understanding is that Larry doesn't
> want to admin OWASP boxes going forward and I am taking that into
> account in my planning. If my assumptions about Larry's future
> involvement are incorrect, I need to know that. In general, we're
> looking at getting ~10 cloud hosts (all Linux) to run the various bits
> of our infrastructure plus have spares to experiment on.
> 2) The purpose of the Skype call is not to actually do the facilitation
> but to make sure both parties are on the same page. Additionally, it
> will ensure both the Board and Richard want to move forward to do the
> actual work. Assuming there is mutual agreement, then we'd need to set
> a time for the actual meeting on goals for the board / OWASP.
> -- Matt Tesauro
> OWASP Board Member
> OWASP WTE Project Lead
> http://AppSecLive.org <http://appseclive.org/> - Community and Download
> On 11/04/2010 12:11 AM, Jeff Williams wrote:
> > Matt,
> > 1) Do you know how the Rackspace solution stacks up against our
> > requirements? Obviously the price is right, but will they provide any
> > support? Will this help offload Larry's support to OWASP or will it just
> > make things more difficult for him?
> > 2) I like the concept of getting someone to facilitate identifying some
> > goals for the board. I suspect that this will massively derail the
> > though. Should we schedule some specific time just for this discussion?
> > --Jeff
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owasp-board-bounces at lists.owasp.org
> > [mailto:owasp-board-bounces at lists.owasp.org] On Behalf Of Matt Tesauro
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 11:34 PM
> > To: OWASP Foundation Board List
> > Subject: [Owasp-board] Items for DC board meeting
> > I have a couple of items for the DC board meeting. I will be adding
> > (and some more details) to the agenda over the weekend.
> > (1) I have a tentative "hand-shake" agreement from the CSO of Rackspace
> > them to provide OWASP hosting on their cloud infrastructure in exchange
> > a corporate membership + some verbiage along the lines of "hosted by
> > Rackspace Cloud" on the www.owasp.org. There are still specific details
> > work out but it looks my second go at Rackspace is going to solve our
> > hosting issues.
> > (2) I have planned to have Richard Tesauro (my father) Skype into our
> > meeting to discuss working with the board to define some short, medium
> > long term goals. I have mentioned this several times in the past and
> > think its time to get this done especially with the Summit approaching in
> > 2011. I've attached his bio/vita to this email so you can get an idea of
> > his background. He has agreed to do the work for a nominal hourly rate
> > (more then 80% off his normal rate) if the board truly wants to engage
> > services.
> > Thoughts?
> > --
> > -- Matt Tesauro
> > OWASP Board Member
> > OWASP WTE Project Lead
> > http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Category:OWASP_Live_CD_Project
> > http://AppSecLive.org <http://appseclive.org/> - Community and Download
> Owasp-board mailing list
> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
OWASP Global Board Member
OWASP Code Review Guide Lead Author
Sent from my i-Transmogrifier
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Owasp-board