[Global_membership_committee] it's that time of the year again - honorary memberships

[Seba]

My opinion inline
Seba

Op vrijdag 30 maart 2012 schreef Kate Hartmann (kate.hartmann at owasp.org)
het volgende:

> Group, as we prepare to launch the 2012 election season, it’s time to
> debate again the role, purpose, and appropriateness of honorary memberships.
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> 1.  Are we granting all chapter leaders honorary membership?****
>
Yes

> 2.  Are we granting all co-chapter leaders and chapter board members
> honorary membership?****
>
Yes

> 3.  Are we granting all project leaders honorary membership?  Project
> reviewers?****
>
Yes,yes

> 4.  Are we considering the “o-point” system raised at the 2010 summit?****
>
No, not necessary with above answers

> 5.  Are we going to use a “self-nomination” form (much to the dismay of
> the EU crowd)****
>
How do you mean?

> 6.  What about people on the leaders list?  What about people who show up
> for chapter meetings? (sarcasm)****
>
People on the leaders list fall under 1. And 2.
No for people showing up for chapter meetings.

> ** **
>
> ARE WE GOING TO DISSOLVE THE CONCEPT COMPLETELY AND STICK TO MEMBERS FOR
> VOTING?****
>
> ** **
>
> We need to discuss via email thread…****
>
> ** **
>
> Tom, and Dan, I think I know your point of view, but I’m always ready to
> listen.****
>
> ** **
>
> Kate Hartmann****
>
> Operations Director****
>
> 301-275-9403****
>
> www.owasp.org ****
>
> Skype:  Kate.hartmann1****
>
> ** **
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/global_membership_committee/attachments/20120330/4fb7d375/attachment.html>