[Global_conference_committee] **TIME SENSITIVE** GCC Policy Exception?
tomb at owasp.org
Sat Jun 4 12:41:51 EDT 2011
Agreed, but not the context of a conference it gets tricky. Your promoting a open organization and training as part of the conference and then you have a closed class... mixed messages. This is a separate topic from conference activities.
On Jun 4, 2011, at 12:35 PM, Dave Wichers wrote:
> I think it’s perfectly OK for OWASP to broker such a class, and get their cut of the total deal. What a great way for OWASP to generate more revenue for itself. As long as we don’t shut the doors on the existing open classes, then I see no problem with this.
> From: global_conference_committee-bounces at lists.owasp.org [mailto:global_conference_committee-bounces at lists.owasp.org] On Behalf Of Tom Brennan
> Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 6:20 PM
> To: Mark Bristow
> Cc: global_conference_committee; Eoin
> Subject: Re: [Global_conference_committee] **TIME SENSITIVE** GCC Policy Exception?
> O = Open
> If they want a private class - hire one of the many providers that are corporate supporters after sampling there classes and getting feedback.
> Problem solved.
> On Jun 3, 2011, at 6:17 PM, Mark Bristow <mark.bristow at owasp.org> wrote:
> Should be united they had already selected there classes. This is truly an add-on to the already planned classes
> Mark Bristow
> Global Conferences Committee, Chair
> mark.bristow at owasp.org
> (703) 596-5175
> Sent concisely from my wireless device
> ----- Reply message -----
> From: "John Wilander" <john.wilander at owasp.org>
> To: "Mark Bristow" <mark.bristow at owasp.org>
> Cc: "Benjamin Tomhave" <benjamin.tomhave at owasp.org>, "Cassio Goldschmidt" <cassio at owasp.org>, "Eoin" <eoin.keary at owasp.org>, "Kate Hartmann" <kate.hartmann at owasp.org>, "Lucas Ferreira" <lucas.ferreira at owasp.org>, "Mohd Fazli Azran" <fazli at owasp.org>, "Neil Matatall" <neil at owasp.org>, "Ralph Durkee" <ralph.durkee at owasp.org>, "Richard Greenberg" <richard.greenberg at owasp.org>, "Sarah Baso" <sarah.baso at owasp.org>, "global_conference_committee" <global_conference_committee at lists.owasp.org>
> Subject: **TIME SENSITIVE** GCC Policy Exception?
> Date: Fri, Jun 3, 2011 5:18 pm
> 2011/6/3 Mark Bristow <mark.bristow at owasp.org>
> organize a 2-day training class, based on OWASP materials, at the conference in addition to our other classes.
> Since it's in addition to all the open courses it's a win-win on the surface. But if the highest rated trainers (or worse, the only skilled trainers on either of these two topics) skip the open classes and opt for the pre-booked, solid profit classes the community is missing out on training that would otherwise be, hence not an addition. In such a case I see trouble ahead, such as complaints from attendees as well as other trainers.
> To avoid that we should not let trainers know ahead of submitting their proposals and we should toss a coin who gets to give these classes and who gets to give the open ones.
> Regards, John
> John Wilander, https://twitter.com/johnwilander
> Chapter co-leader OWASP Sweden, http://owaspsweden.blogspot.com
> Conf Comm, http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Global_Conferences_Committee
> Global_conference_committee mailing list
> Global_conference_committee at lists.owasp.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Global_conference_committee