[Global_conference_committee] **TIME SENSITIVE** GCC Policy Exception?

[Mark Bristow]

 Tom by my read that motion passed as long as its a side event (committee
members correct me if i misinterpreted your positions).  Once the extended
cfp goes out all current supporters (including trustwave) will all be
welcome to put forth proposed classes as will anyone else interested.

Mark Bristow
Global Conferences Committee, Chair
mark.bristow at owasp.org
(703) 596-5175

Sent concisely from my wireless device

----- Reply message -----
From: "Tom Brennan" <tomb at owasp.org>
To: "Mark Bristow" <mark.bristow at owasp.org>
Cc: "Cassio Goldschmidt" <cassio at owasp.org>, "LornaAlamri" <
lorna.alamri at owasp.org>, "global_conference_committee" <
global_conference_committee at lists.owasp.org>, "Eoin" <eoin.keary at owasp.org>
Subject: [Global_conference_committee] **TIME SENSITIVE** GCC Policy
Exception?
Date: Fri, Jun 3, 2011 7:58 pm



When they are told that we can not do a private training... However they CAN
buy all seats at a existing training that is a ++

Since they are hot to buy training, they should visit the expo floor and
talk to the supporters ;)

Semper Fi,

Tom Brennan
Director, Trustwave SpiderLabs
Tel: 973-202-0122
URL: www.trustwave.com






On Jun 3, 2011, at 7:52 PM, Mark Bristow <mark.bristow at owasp.org> wrote:

Lorna,

Cassio makes 5.  It seems like this needs to be a side event which fits what
you were planning.

Also I echo the congratulations on generating so much interest.

Mark Bristow
Global Conferences Committee, Chair
mark.bristow at owasp.org
(703) 596-5175

Sent concisely from my wireless device

----- Reply message -----
From: "Cassio Goldschmidt" <cassio at owasp.org>
To: "Tom Brennan" <tomb at owasp.org>
Cc: "Mark Bristow" <mark.bristow at owasp.org>, "global_conference_committee" <
global_conference_committee at lists.owasp.org>, "Eoin" <eoin.keary at owasp.org>
Subject: [Global_conference_committee] **TIME SENSITIVE** GCC Policy
Exception?
Date: Fri, Jun 3, 2011 7:10 pm



As Tom and Lucas said, it needs to be a side activity.

Having said that, congrats for getting an entire company to send their
developers to class! This is great accomplishment.

Cassio
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Tom Brennan <tomb at owasp.org> wrote:

> O = Open
>
> If they want a private class - hire one of the many providers that are
> corporate supporters after sampling there classes and getting feedback.
>
> Problem solved.
>
>
>
>
> On Jun 3, 2011, at 6:17 PM, Mark Bristow <mark.bristow at owasp.org> wrote:
>
> Should be united they had already selected there classes.  This is truly an
> add-on to the already planned classes
>
> Mark Bristow
> Global Conferences Committee, Chair
> <mark.bristow at owasp.org>mark.bristow at owasp.org
> (703) 596-5175
>
> Sent concisely from my wireless device
>
> ----- Reply message -----
> From: "John Wilander" < <john.wilander at owasp.org>john.wilander at owasp.org>
> To: "Mark Bristow" < <mark.bristow at owasp.org>mark.bristow at owasp.org>
> Cc: "Benjamin Tomhave" < <benjamin.tomhave at owasp.org>
> benjamin.tomhave at owasp.org>, "Cassio Goldschmidt" < <cassio at owasp.org>
> cassio at owasp.org>, "Eoin" < <eoin.keary at owasp.org>eoin.keary at owasp.org>,
> "Kate Hartmann" < <kate.hartmann at owasp.org>kate.hartmann at owasp.org>,
> "Lucas Ferreira" < <lucas.ferreira at owasp.org>lucas.ferreira at owasp.org>,
> "Mohd Fazli Azran" < <fazli at owasp.org>fazli at owasp.org>, "Neil Matatall" <<neil at owasp.org>
> neil at owasp.org>, "Ralph Durkee" < <ralph.durkee at owasp.org>
> ralph.durkee at owasp.org>, "Richard Greenberg" <<richard.greenberg at owasp.org>
> richard.greenberg at owasp.org>, "Sarah Baso" < <sarah.baso at owasp.org>
> sarah.baso at owasp.org>, "global_conference_committee" <<global_conference_committee at lists.owasp.org>
> global_conference_committee at lists.owasp.org>
> Subject: **TIME SENSITIVE** GCC Policy Exception?
> Date: Fri, Jun 3, 2011 5:18 pm
>
>
>
> 2011/6/3 Mark Bristow < <mark.bristow at owasp.org>mark.bristow at owasp.org>
>
>> organize a 2-day training class, based on OWASP materials, at the
>> conference in addition to our other classes.
>>
>
> Since it's in *addition* to all the open courses it's a win-win on the
> surface. But if the highest rated trainers (or worse, the only skilled
> trainers on either of these two topics) skip the open classes and opt for
> the pre-booked, solid profit classes the community is missing out on
> training that would otherwise be, hence not an *addition*. In such a case
> I see trouble ahead, such as complaints from attendees as well as other
> trainers.
>
> To avoid that we should not let trainers know ahead of submitting their
> proposals and we should toss a coin who gets to give these classes and who
> gets to give the open ones.
>
>    Regards, John
>
> --
> John Wilander, <https://twitter.com/johnwilander>
> https://twitter.com/johnwilander
> Chapter co-leader OWASP Sweden, <http://owaspsweden.blogspot.com>
> http://owaspsweden.blogspot.com
> Conf Comm,  <http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Global_Conferences_Committee>
> http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Global_Conferences_Committee<http://owaspsweden.blogspot.com>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Global_conference_committee mailing list
> Global_conference_committee at lists.owasp.org
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global_conference_committee
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Global_conference_committee mailing list
> Global_conference_committee at lists.owasp.org
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global_conference_committee
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/global_conference_committee/attachments/20110603/9dd1d3e2/attachment.html