[Global_conference_committee] Feedback to authors

[Lucas Ferreira]

Hello Mark,

I was asking about feedback to authors that respond to the conferences Call
for Presentations. I know this may be handled by Easychair, but I would like
to understand what kind of feedback has been provided. For Appsec Brasil
2010, our program committee assigned grades (1 to 10) to several criteria we
defined. There was not a textual feedback on what could be improved in the
proposal, for example, and no need to explain the grade assigned to each
criteria.

I understand that having evaluators write down the reasons for each grade
would provide better feedback for the authors, but many revewers declined to
participate (usually at or very near the deadline) due to lack of time and
we may increase this problem if we required more work from the reviewers.

Thanks,

Lucas

On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:19, Mark Bristow <mark.bristow at owasp.org> wrote:

> I believe this is managed via CVENT.
>
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Lucas Ferreira <lucas.ferreira at owasp.org>wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> how do OWASP conferences usually handle feedback to authors? Is there a
>> guideline? We have several authosr complaining about feedback and had no
>> process setup for that.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Lucas
>>
>> --
>> Homo sapiens non urinat in ventum.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Global_conference_committee mailing list
>> Global_conference_committee at lists.owasp.org
>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global_conference_committee
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Mark Bristow
>
> OWASP Global Conferences Committee Chair - http://is.gd/5MTvF
> AppSec DC 2010 Organizer - https://www.appsecdc.org
> OWASP DC Chapter Co-Chair - http://is.gd/5MTwu
>



-- 
Homo sapiens non urinat in ventum.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/global_conference_committee/attachments/20100928/787ca8db/attachment.html